Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach
View/ Open
Date
2017-06Author
Pascual, Unai
Balvanera, Patricia
Díaz, Sandra
Pataki, György
Roth, Eva
Stenseke, Marie
Watson, Robert T.
Dessane, Esra Başak
Islar, Mine
Kelemen, Eszter
Maris, Virginie
Quaas, Martin
Subramanian, Suneetha M
Wittmer, Heidi
Adlan, Asia
Ahn, SoEun
Al-Hafedh, Yousef S.
Amankwah, Edward
Asah, Stanley T.
Berry, Pam
Bilgin, Adem
Breslow, Sara J.
Bullock, Craig
Cáceres, Daniel
Daly-Hassen, Hamed
Figueroa, Eugenio
Golden, Christopher D.
Gómez-Baggethun, E
González-Jiménez, David
Houdet, Joël
Keune, Hans
Kumar, Ritesh
Ma, Keping
May, Peter H.
Mead, Aroha
O’Farrell, Patrick
Pandit, Ram
Pengue, Walter
Pichis-Madruga, Ramón
Popa, Florin
Preston, Susan
Pacheco-Balanza, Diego
Saarikoski, Heli
Strassburg, Bernardo B.
Van den Belt, Marjan
Verma, Madhu
Wickson, Fern
Yagi, Noboyuki
Metadata
Show full item record
Current opinion in environmental sustainability 26-27 : 7-16 (2017)
Abstract
Nature is perceived and valued in starkly different and often conflicting ways. This paper presents the rationale for the inclusive valuation of nature's contributions to people (NCP) in decision making, as well as broad methodological steps for doing so. While developed within the context of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), this approach is more widely applicable to initiatives at the knowledge-policy interface, which require a pluralistic approach to recognizing the diversity of values. We argue that transformative practices aiming at sustainable futures would benefit from embracing such diversity, which require recognizing and addressing power relationships across stakeholder groups that hold different values on human naturerelations and NCP.