Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRe, Daniele
dc.contributor.authorInbar, Maya
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Craig G.
dc.contributor.authorLandau, Ayelet N.
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-20T07:16:32Z
dc.date.available2019-08-20T07:16:32Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationDaniele Re, Maya Inbar, Craig G. Richter, Ayelet N. Landau, Feature-Based Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically, Current Biology, Volume 29, Issue 4, 2019, Pages 693-699.e4, ISSN 0960-9822, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.010.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0960-9822
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/34983
dc.descriptionPublished: February 7, 2019es_ES
dc.description.abstractAttention supports the allocation of resources to relevant locations and objects in a scene. Under most conditions, several stimuli compete for neural representation. Attention biases neural representation toward the response associated with the attended object [1, 2]. Therefore, an attended stimulus enjoys a neural response that resembles the response to that stimulus in isolation. Factors that determine and generate attentional bias have been researched, ranging from endogenously controlled processes to exogenous capture of attention [1–4]. Recent studies investigate the temporal structure governing attention. When participants monitor a single location, visual-target detection depends on the phase of an 8-Hz brain rhythm [5, 6]. When two locations are monitored, performance fluctuates at 4 Hz for each location [7, 8]. The hypothesis is that 4-Hz sampling for two locations may reflect a common sampler that operates at 8 Hz globally, which is divided between relevant locations [5–7, 9]. The present study targets two properties of this phenomenon, called rhythmic-attentional sampling: first, sampling is typically described for selection over different locations. We examined whether rhythmic sampling is limited to selection over space or whether it extends to feature-based attention. Second, we examined whether sampling at 4 Hz results from the division of an 8-Hz rhythm over two objects.We found that two overlapping objects defined by features are sampled at 4 Hz per object. In addition, performance on a single object fluctuated at 8 Hz. Rhythmic sampling of features did not result from temporal structure in eye movements.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by funds from the James McDonnell Scholar Award for Understanding Human Cognition as well as the National Israeli Psychobiology Institute (both awarded to A.N.L.). As a library fellow, A.N.L. would like to thank the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute for providing the psace to think and write. M.I. is supported by the Humanities Fund PhD program in Linguistics and the Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel School for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, and C.G.R. is supported via the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, through the ‘‘Severo Ochoa Programme for Centres/ Units of Excellence in R&D’’ (SEV-2015-490).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherCurrent Biologyes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/SEV-2015-0490es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectfeature-based attentiones_ES
dc.subjectattentional samplinges_ES
dc.subjectthetaes_ES
dc.subjectperceptual cycleses_ES
dc.subjectrandom-dot kinetogramses_ES
dc.subjectRDKes_ES
dc.subjectmicrosaccadeses_ES
dc.subjectalphaes_ES
dc.subjectbrain oscillationses_ES
dc.subjectdistributed attentiones_ES
dc.subjectexplorationes_ES
dc.titleFeature-Based Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmicallyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2019 Elsevier Ltd.es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.cell.com/current-biology/homees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.010


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record