Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStojanović, Marko D. M.
dc.contributor.authorMikić, Mladen
dc.contributor.authorDrid, Patrik
dc.contributor.authorCalleja González, Julio María ORCID
dc.contributor.authorMaksimović, Nebojša
dc.contributor.authorBelegišanin, Bogdan
dc.contributor.authorSekulović, Veselin
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-08T10:51:03Z
dc.date.available2021-02-08T10:51:03Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-29
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (3) : (2021) // Article ID 1181es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/50089
dc.description.abstractThe main aim of the present study was to compare the effects of flywheel strength training and traditional strength training on fitness attributes. Thirty-six well trained junior basketball players (n = 36; 17.58 ± 0.50 years) were recruited and randomly allocated into: Flywheel group (FST; n = 12), traditional strength training group (TST; n = 12) and control group (CON; n = 12). All groups attended 5 basketball practices and one official match a week during the study period. Experimental groups additionally participated in the eight-week, 1–2 d/w equivolume intervention conducted using a flywheel device (inertia = 0.075 kg·m−2) for FST or free weights (80%1 RM) for TST. Pre-to post changes in lower limb isometric strength (ISOMET), 5 and 20 m sprint time (SPR5m and SPR20m), countermovement jump height (CMJ) and change of direction ability (t-test) were assessed with analyses of variance (3 × 2 ANOVA). Significant group-by-time interaction was found for ISOMET (F = 6.40; p = 0.000), CMJ (F = 7.45; p = 0.001), SPR5m (F = 7.45; p = 0.010) and T test (F = 10.46; p = 0.000). The results showed a significantly higher improvement in CMJ (p = 0.006; 11.7% vs. 6.8%), SPR5m (p = 0.001; 10.3% vs. 5.9%) and t-test (p = 0.045; 2.4% vs. 1.5%) for FST compared to the TST group. Simultaneously, th FST group had higher improvement in ISOMET (p = 0.014; 18.7% vs. 2.9%), CMJ (p = 0.000; 11.7% vs. 0.3%), SPR5m (p = 0.000; 10.3% vs. 3.4%) and t-test (p = 0.000; 2.4% vs. 0.6%) compared to the CON group. Players from the TST group showed better results in CMJ (p = 0.006; 6.8% vs. 0.3%) and t-test (p = 0.018; 1.5% vs. 0.6%) compared to players from the CON group. No significant group-by-time interaction was found for sprint 20 m (F = 2.52; p = 0.088). Eight weeks of flywheel training (1–2 sessions per week) performed at maximum concentric intensity induces superior improvements in CMJ, 5 m sprint time and change of direction ability than equivolumed traditional weight training in well trained junior basketball players. Accordingly, coaches and trainers could be advised to use flywheel training for developing power related performance attributes in young basketball players.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.subjectisoinertial traininges_ES
dc.subjectstrength traininges_ES
dc.subjectvertical jumpes_ES
dc.subjectchange of direction abilityes_ES
dc.titleGreater Power but Not Strength Gains Using Flywheel Versus Equivolumed Traditional Strength Training in Junior Basketball Playerses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.date.updated2021-02-05T14:10:06Z
dc.rights.holder2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1181/htmes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph18031181
dc.departamentoesEducación física y deportiva
dc.departamentoeuGorputz eta Kirol Hezkuntza


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).