Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCorrea Araneda, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorNúñez, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorDíaz, María E.
dc.contributor.authorGómez Capponi, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorFigueroa, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorAcuña, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.authorBoyero González, María Luz ORCID
dc.contributor.authorEsse, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-03T11:20:08Z
dc.date.available2021-06-03T11:20:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-06
dc.identifier.citationEcological Indicators 125 : (2021) // Araticle ID 107551es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1470-160X
dc.identifier.issn1872-7034
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/51738
dc.description.abstractForest wetlands are biodiversity hotspots that perform functions of vital ecological importance, but they are among the world's most threatened ecosystems. Due to their high diversity of habitats and species, the study of their benthic macroinvertebrate communities is challenging, and there is no consensus on which sampling methods allow a better representation of these communities. Here we compared the performance of 3 sampling methods (hand net, corer and litterbags) in 2 temporary and 3 permanent forested wetlands in southern Chile, which were bimonthly sampled throughout a year, with 108 samples per wetland. Our results indicated that the greatest abundance and diversity were collected with the hand net, followed by the litterbags and the corer. The composition of communities collected by the hand net and litterbags were more similar between them than that of communities collected by the corer (where Chironomidae and Oligochaeta were common). We suggest that the combined use of the hand net and corer could provide a good representation of macroinvertebrate communities in forest wetlands, as they would allow recording most of the diversity, including taxa that are both sensitive and tolerant to stressors.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFondecyt de Iniciacion 11170390. CHRIAM Centro de Recursos Hidricos para la Agricultura y la Mineria.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectcoreres_ES
dc.subjecthand netes_ES
dc.subjectlitterbagses_ES
dc.subjectMediterranean zoneses_ES
dc.subjectpermanent water regimees_ES
dc.subjecttemporary water regimees_ES
dc.titleComparison of Sampling Methods for Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Forested Wetlandses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holderThis article is available under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND licensees_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www-sciencedirect-com.ehu.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S1470160X21002168?via%3Dihub#!es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107551
dc.departamentoesBiología vegetal y ecologíaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuLandaren biologia eta ekologiaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This article is available under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND license
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This article is available under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND license