Short- and long-term warming effects of methane may affect the cost-effectiveness of mitigation policies and benefits of low-meat diets
View/ Open
Date
2021Author
Pérez-Domínguez, I.
del Prado, A.
Mittenzwei, K.
Hristov, J.
Frank, S.
Tabeau, A.
Witzke, P.
Havlik, P.
van Meijl, H.
Lynch, J.
Stehfest, E.
Pardo, G.
Barreiro-Hurle, J.
Koopman, J.F.L.
Sanz-Sánchez, M.J.
Metadata
Show full item record
Nature Food: 2 (12): 970-980 (2021)
Abstract
© 2021, The Author(s).Methane’s short atmospheric life has important implications for the design of global climate change mitigation policies in agriculture. Three different agricultural economic models are used to explore how short- and long-term warming effects of methane can affect the cost-effectiveness of mitigation policies and dietary transitions. Results show that the choice of a particular metric for methane’s warming potential is key to determine optimal mitigation options, with metrics based on shorter-term impacts leading to greater overall emission reduction. Also, the promotion of low-meat diets is more effective at reducing greenhouse gas emissions compared to carbon pricing when mitigation policies are based on metrics that reflect methane’s long-term behaviour. A combination of stringent mitigation measures and dietary changes could achieve substantial emission reduction levels, helping reverse the contribution of agriculture to global warming.