Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChan, K.M.A
dc.contributor.authorBoyd, D. R.
dc.contributor.authorGould, R. K.
dc.contributor.authorJetzkowitz, J.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, J.
dc.contributor.authorMuraca, B.
dc.contributor.authorNaidoo, R.
dc.contributor.authorOlmsted, P.
dc.contributor.authorSatterfield, T.
dc.contributor.authorSelomane, O.
dc.contributor.authorSingh, G. G.
dc.contributor.authorSumaila, R.
dc.contributor.authorNgo, H. T.
dc.contributor.authorBoedhihartono, A. K.
dc.contributor.authorAgard, J.
dc.contributor.authorDe Aguiar, A. P. D
dc.contributor.authorArmenteras, D.
dc.contributor.authorBalint, L.
dc.contributor.authorBarrington-Leigh, C.
dc.contributor.authorCheung, W. W. L.
dc.contributor.authorDriscol, J.
dc.contributor.authorDíaz, S.
dc.contributor.authorEsler, K.
dc.contributor.authorEyster, H.
dc.contributor.authorGregr, E. J.
dc.contributor.authorHashimoto, S.
dc.contributor.authorHernández Pedraza, G. C.
dc.contributor.authorHickler, T.
dc.contributor.authorKok, M.
dc.contributor.authorLazarova, T.
dc.contributor.authorMohamed, A. A. A.
dc.contributor.authorMurray-Hudson, M.
dc.contributor.authorO'Farrell, P.
dc.contributor.authorPalomo, I.
dc.contributor.authorSaysel, A. K.
dc.contributor.authorSeppelt, R.
dc.contributor.authorSettele, J.
dc.contributor.authorStrassburg, B.
dc.contributor.authorXue, D.
dc.contributor.authorBrondízio, E. S.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-15T12:01:39Z
dc.date.available2023-06-15T12:01:39Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-23
dc.identifier.citationPeople and Nature: 2 (3): 693-717-717 (2020)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/61394
dc.description.abstractHumanity is on a deeply unsustainable trajectory. We are exceeding planetary boundaries and unlikely to meet many international sustainable development goals and global environmental targets. Until recently, there was no broadly accepted framework of interventions that could ignite the transformations needed to achieve these desired targets and goals. As a component of the IPBES Global Assessment, we conducted an iterative expert deliberation process with an extensive review of scenarios and pathways to sustainability, including the broader literature on indirect drivers, social change and sustainability transformation. We asked, what are the most important elements of pathways to sustainability? Applying a social ecological systems lens, we identified eight priority points for intervention (leverage points) and five overarching strategic actions and priority interventions (levers), which appear to be key to societal transformation. The eight leverage points are: (1) Visions of a good life, (2) Total consumption and waste, (3) Latent values of responsibility, (4) Inequalities, (5) Justice and inclusion in conservation, (6) Externalities from trade and other telecouplings, (7) Responsible technology, innovation and investment, and (8) Education and knowledge generation and sharing. The five intertwined levers can be applied across the eight leverage points and more broadly. These include: (A) Incentives and capacity building, (B) Coordination across sectors and jurisdictions, (C) Pre-emptive action, (D) Adaptive decision-making and (E) Environmental law and implementation. The levers and leverage points are all non-substitutable, and each enables others, likely leading to synergistic benefits. Transformative change towards sustainable pathways requires more than a simple scaling-up of sustainability initiatives it entails addressing these levers and leverage points to change the fabric of legal, political, economic and other social systems. These levers and leverage points build upon those approved within the Global Assessment's Summary for Policymakers, with the aim of enabling leaders in government, business, civil society and academia to spark transformative changes towards a more just and sustainable world. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. © 2020 The Authors. People and Nature published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Societyes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis first many drafts of this work were conducted via the IPBES Global Assessment, so we owe much to IPBES Chair Robert T. Watson, Executive Secretary Anne Larigauderie, the IPBES Global Assessment Technical Support Unit including Maximilien Guèze, the data visualization specialist Yuka O. Estrada, the IPBES Multidisciplinary Expert Panel and IPBES Bureau and many coordinating lead authors, lead authors and reviewers including representatives of IPBES' 132 member countries (at the time of the finalization of the Global Assessment). We also acknowledge the support of Environment and Climate Change Canada, Faculty of Science at the University of British Columbia and the Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Discovery Grant #RGPIN‐2015‐05105) and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (Insight Grant #435‐2017‐1071), U.S. National Science Foundation, and Michigan AgBioResearch.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherPeople and Naturees_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectbiodiversityes_ES
dc.subjectecosystem serviceses_ES
dc.subjectgovernance interventionses_ES
dc.subjecthuman population sizees_ES
dc.subjectindirect driverses_ES
dc.subjectIntergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)es_ES
dc.subjectpolicyes_ES
dc.subjectrelational valueses_ES
dc.titleLevers and leverage points for pathways to sustainabilityes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2020, The Author(s).es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10124es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pan3.10124


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020, The Author(s).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020, The Author(s).