Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHimes, A.
dc.contributor.authorMuraca, B.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, C.B.
dc.contributor.authorAthayde, S.
dc.contributor.authorBeery, T.
dc.contributor.authorCantú-Fernández, M.
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Jiménez, D.
dc.contributor.authorGould, R.K.
dc.contributor.authorHejnowicz, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorKenter, J.
dc.contributor.authorLenzi, D.
dc.contributor.authorMurali, R.
dc.contributor.authorPascual, U.
dc.contributor.authorRaymond, C.
dc.contributor.authorRing, A.
dc.contributor.authorRusso, K.
dc.contributor.authorSamakov, A.
dc.contributor.authorStålhammar, S.
dc.contributor.authorThorén, H.
dc.contributor.authorZent, E.
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-26T14:22:50Z
dc.date.available2024-02-26T14:22:50Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.identifier.citationBioScience: 74 (1): 25-43 (2024)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/66119
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we present results from a literature review of intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values of nature conducted for the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, as part of the Methodological Assessment of the Diverse Values and Valuations of Nature. We identify the most frequently recurring meanings in the heterogeneous use of different value types and their association with worldviews and other key concepts. From frequent uses, we determine a core meaning for each value type, which is sufficiently inclusive to serve as an umbrella over different understandings in the literature and specific enough to help highlight its difference from the other types of values. Finally, we discuss convergences, overlapping areas, and fuzzy boundaries between different value types to facilitate dialogue, reduce misunderstandings, and improve the methods for valuation of nature's contributions to people, including ecosystem services, to inform policy and direct future research. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Institute of Biological Sciences.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe are grateful to the IPBES, whose member states commissioned the values assessment and approved its summary for policymak-ers. This article is based on work begun as part of the assessment’s chapter 2, which was enriched by three external review periods, including comments from academics, governments, civil society organizations, and other stakeholders. We are also deeply grateful for the contributions from chapter 2 reviewer editor Kai Chan and management committee members Bibiana Vilá, Antonio Díaz-de-León, and Chimère Diaw as liaisons to the Multidisciplinary Ex-pert Panel. The present authors received no specific funding for this work; all authors involved in IPBES do so on a voluntary basis. The IPBES values assessment was made possible thanks to many generous contributions, including nonearmarked contributions to the IPBES trust fund from governments. All donors are listed on the IPBES website: www.ipbes.net/donors.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBioSciencees_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectassessmentses_ES
dc.subjectbiodiversityes_ES
dc.subjectphilosophyes_ES
dc.subjectpolicyes_ES
dc.subjectethicses_ES
dc.subjectsustainabilityes_ES
dc.titleWhy nature matters: A systematic review of intrinsic, instrumental, and relational valueses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/reviewes_ES
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2023.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biad109es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/biosci/biad109


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2023.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2023.