Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGastaminza Lasarte, Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorAlgorta Pineda, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorUriel Villate, Olga
dc.contributor.authorAudicana Berasategui, Maria Teresa
dc.contributor.authorFernández, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorSanz, María L.
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-16T14:22:01Z
dc.date.available2012-04-16T14:22:01Z
dc.date.issued2011-08-09
dc.identifier.citationTrials 12(191) : (2011)es
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/7328
dc.descriptionTrial registration number: CTRN12611000543987es
dc.description.abstractBackground: Natural rubber latex allergy is a common and unsolved health problem. Since the avoidance of exposure is very difficult, immunotherapy is strongly recommended, but before its use in patients, it is essential to prove the efficacy and safety of extracts. The aim of the present randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of latex sublingual immunotherapy in adult patients undergoing permanent latex avoidance. Methods: Twenty-eight adult latex-allergic patients (5 males and 23 females), with mean age of 39 years (range 24-57) were randomized to receive a commercial latex-sublingual immunotherapy or placebo during one year, followed by another year of open, active therapy. The following outcomes were measured at baseline and at the end of first and second year of follow-up: skin prick test, gloves-use score, conjunctival challenge test, total and specific IgE, basophil activation test, and adverse reactions monitoring. Results: No significant difference in any of the efficacy in vivo variables was observed between active and placebo groups at the end of the placebo-controlled phase, nor when each group was compared with their baseline values at the end of the two year-study. An improvement in the average percentage of basophils activated was observed. During the induction phase, 4 reactions in the active group and 5 in the placebo group were recorded. During the maintenance phase, two patients dropped out due to pruritus and to acute dermatitis respectively. Conclusion: Further studies are needed to evaluate latex-sublingual immunotherapy, since efficacy could not be demonstrated in adult patients with avoidance of the allergen.es
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was partially funded by FIS (PI04/2301), Fundacion SEAIC 2004, Fundacion Jesus Gangoiti Barrera 2004.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherBioMed Centrales
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.subjecthealth care workerses
dc.subjectcontact urticariaes
dc.subjectextractes
dc.subjectreactivityes
dc.titleRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controled clinical trial of sublingual immunotherapy in natural rubber latex allergic patientses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2011 Gastaminza et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.trialsjournal.com/content/12/1/191es
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1745-6215-12-191
dc.departamentoesBioquímica y biología moleculares_ES
dc.departamentoeuBiokimika eta biologia molekularraes_ES
dc.subject.categoriaMEDICINE
dc.subject.categoriaPHARMACOLOGY (MEDICAL)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record