Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAurrekoetxea Agirre, Juan José ORCID
dc.contributor.authorMurcia, Mario
dc.contributor.authorRebagliato, Marisa
dc.contributor.authorLópez, María José
dc.contributor.authorCastilla, Ane Miren
dc.contributor.authorSanta Marina, Loreto
dc.contributor.authorGuxens, Mónica
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Somoano, Ana
dc.contributor.authorEspada Sáenz-Torre, Mercedes
dc.contributor.authorLertxundi Manterola, Aitana
dc.contributor.authorTardón, Adonina
dc.contributor.authorBallester, Ferrán
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-31T19:22:41Z
dc.date.available2014-01-31T19:22:41Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-24
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open 3(1) : (2013) // Article Number: e002034es
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/11325
dc.description10 p.es
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To estimate the prevalence and factors associated with smoking and misclassification in pregnant women from INMA (INfancia y Medio Ambiente, Environment and Childhood) project, Spain, and to assess the optimal cut-offs for urinary cotinine (UC) that best distinguish daily and occasional smokers with varying levels of second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure.-- Design: We used logistic regression models to study the relationship between sociodemographic variables and self-reported smoking and misclassification (self-reported non-smokers with UC >50 ng/ml). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to calculate the optimal cut-off point for discriminating smokers. The cut-offs were also calculated after stratification among non-smokers by the number of sources of SHS exposure. The cut-off points used to discriminate smoking status were the level of UC given by Youden's index and for 50 and 100 ng/ml for daily smokers, or 25 and 50 ng/ml for occasional smokers. -- Participants: At the third trimester of pregnancy, 2263 pregnant women of the INMA Project were interviewed between 2004 and 2008 and a urine sample was collected. -- Results: Prevalence of self-reported smokers at the third trimester of pregnancy was 18.5%, and another 3.9% misreported their smoking status. Variables associated with self-reported smoking and misreporting were similar, including born in Europe, educational level and exposure to SHS. The optimal cut-off was 82 ng/ml (95% CI 42 to 133), sensitivity 95.2% and specificity 96.6%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.986 (95% CI 0.982 to 0.990). The cut-offs varied according to the SHS exposure level being 42 (95% CI 27 to 57), 82 (95% CI 46 to 136) and 106 ng/ml (95% CI 58 to 227) for not being SHS exposed, exposed to one, and to two or more sources of SHS, respectively. The optimal cut-off for discriminating occasional smokers from non-smokers was 27 ng/ml (95% CI 11 to 43). -- Conclusions: Prevalence of smoking during pregnancy in Spain remains high. UC is a reliable biomarker for classifying pregnant women according to their smoking status. However, cut-offs would differ based on baseline exposure to SHS.es
dc.description.sponsorshipThe INMA project is funded by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Red INMA G03/176 and CB06/02/0041) and Fundación Roger Torné. The studies in the specific regions were funded by the Spanish Ministry of Health (FIS 03/1615, 04/1436, 04/1509, 04/1112, 04/1931, 05/1079, 05/1052, 06/0867,06/1213, 07/0314, 08/1151, 09/02647, 04/2018, 09/02311), the Generalitat de Catalunya (CIRIT 1999SGR00241), the Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa (DFG06/004), the Department of Health of the Basque Government (2005111093), the Regional Government of Andalucía (SAS 07/183), Obra social Cajastur, University of Oviedo and the Conselleria de Sanitat Generalitat Valenciana. http://www.proyectoinma.org/instituciones-participantes/en_entidades-colaboradoras/.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupes
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.subjectmaternal smokinges
dc.subjectwomenes
dc.subjectaccuracyes
dc.subjectexposurees
dc.subjectbiomarkeres
dc.subjectcessationes
dc.subjectsmokerses
dc.titleDeterminants of self-reported smoking and misclassification during pregnancy, and analysis of optimal cut-off points for urinary cotinine: a cross-sectional studyes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holderThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/3/1/e002034es
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002034
dc.departamentoesMedicina preventiva y salud públicaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuPrebentzio medikuntza eta osasun publikoaes_ES
dc.subject.categoriaMEDICINE


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record