UPV-EHU ADDI
  • Back
    • English
    • Español
    • Euskera
  • Login
  • English 
    • English
    • Español
    • Euskera
  • FAQ
View Item 
  •   Home
  • INVESTIGACIÓN
  • Grupos de Investigación, Institutos y Centros Colaboradores
  • BCBL
  • BCBL-Publications
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • INVESTIGACIÓN
  • Grupos de Investigación, Institutos y Centros Colaboradores
  • BCBL
  • BCBL-Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The Role of Morphological Markedness in the Processing of Number and Gender Agreement in Spanish: An Event-Related Potential Investigation

Thumbnail
View/Open
The role of morphological_Banon.pdf (1.272Mb)
plcp_a_1218032_sm9519.pdf (497.8Kb)
Date
2016
Author
Alemán Bañón, José
Rothman, Jason
Metadata
Show full item record
José Alemán Bañón & Jason Rothman (2016) The role of morphological markedness in the processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: an event-related potential investigation, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31:10, 1273-1298, DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1218032
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10810/20323
Abstract
Current morphological theory assumes that feature values, such as masculine and feminine or singular and plural, are asymmetrically represented. That is, one member of the opposition (e.g. feminine for gender, plural for number) is assumed to be marked, and the other one, unmarked. The present study examines how these asymmetries impact agreement resolution in Spanish. Agreement was manipulated between a noun acting as head of a relative clause and an adjective located inside the relative clause (e.g. catedral que parecía inmensa “cathedral that looked huge”). Half of the nouns were feminine (marked) and the other half, masculine (unmarked). Half of the nouns were used in the plural (marked) and the other half, in the singular (unmarked). Twenty-seven Spanish native speakers read 240 sentences while their brain activity was recorded with electroencephalography and performed a grammaticality judgment. Results showed that both number and gender violations elicited a central-posterior P600, a component associated with syntactic repair, and a late anterior negativity, argued to reflect working memory costs. Only the P600 was affected by markedness. It started earlier for violations where the mismatching feature was marked. Moreover, it was larger for errors where the mismatching feature was marked, although this amplitude modulation only emerged for number, possibly due to differences in how number and gender cues were realized (i.e. both masculine and feminine showed overt inflection, but singular was uninflected relative to plural). These results suggest that the parser is sensitive to markedness asymmetries in the course of online processing.
Collections
  • BCBL-Publications

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
OpenAIRE
OpenAIRE
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesDepartamentos (cas.)Departamentos (eus.)SubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesDepartamentos (cas.)Departamentos (eus.)Subjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
OpenAIRE
OpenAIRE