Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHaranburu Oiharbide, Mikel
dc.contributor.authorBalluerka Lasa, Nekane ORCID
dc.contributor.authorGorostiaga Manterola, Arantxa ORCID
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-06T18:23:25Z
dc.date.available2020-10-06T18:23:25Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationGogoa 18 : 101-129 (2018)
dc.identifier.issn1577-9424
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/46580
dc.description.abstractThe philosophical representations of courage and its components have varied throughout history, depending on the authors, the historical epoch and the cultural context. In this article, we will first make a historical tour through different representations of courage from Greek Antiquity to the Contemporary Age. We will point out the features of courage according to representative authors of the different periods: the exposure to the public of the Homeric hero; the intellectualization of the Socratic and Platonic courage; the return to the military vision of courage by Aristotle; the work and humility ethics of the first Christians; the courage in the solitary confrontation to death in the Middle Ages; the disappearance of the construct of courage and the predominance of the combination of mercantile interests in the Modern Age; the rejection of the theory of the middle term by Machiavelli; the vitalist conception of the courage in Spinoza; the courage for the free use of intelligence in Kant; the courage to overcome mediocrity in Nietzsche; the courage to overcome anxiety in the face of non-being and change in Tillich; the courage to act freely and overcome the excessive attachment to life in Arendt; and the courage to speak the truth despite the opposition of influential people in Foucault. Next, we will carry out a brief review of some psychological definitions of courage and establish its fundamental components. Finally, based on the revision of the philosophical theories, we will suggest the incorporation of new components to the psychological definition of courage.; Adorearen eta haren osagaien errepresentazioek aldaketak izan dituzte historian zehar, egileen, aro historikoaren eta kultur testuinguruaren arabera. Artikulu honetan, lehenik, adorearen errepresentazioen ibilbide historikoa egingo dugu, Greziako Antzinatetik hasi eta Aro Garaikidera arte. Garai ezberdinetako pentsalariek adoreaz emandako deskribapenak agertuko ditugu: heroia jendaurrean bere adorea erakusten, Homeroren arabera; adorearen intelektualizazioa, Sokrates eta Platonen arabera; eremu militarrerako itzulera, Aristotelesen arabera; lanaren eta apaltasunaren etika lehenengo kristauengan; heriotzari bakardadean aurre egiten dion Erdi Aroko adorea; adorearen konstruktuaren desagerpena eta merkataritza-interesen konbinazioaren nagusitasuna, Aro Modernoan; Aristotelesen erdibidearen teoriaren baztertzea, Makiavelorengan; adorearen ikuspegi bitalista, Spinozarengan; adimena askeki erabiltzeko adorea, Kantengan; kaskarkeria gainditzeko adorea, Nietzscherengan; ez-izatearen eta aldaketaren aurrean sortzen den barne-herstura gainditzeko adorea, Tillichengan; modu askean jokatzeko eta bizitzarekiko atxikimendu handiegia gainditzeko adorea, Arendtengan; eta ezberdin pentsatzen duten pertsona boteretsuen aurrean egia esateko adorea, Foucaultengan. Ondoren, adorearen definizio psikologiko batzuk berrikusiko ditugu eta haien osagai nagusiak zein diren ikusiko dugu. Azkenik, teoria filosofikoetan oinarrituta, adorearen definizio psikologikoan beste osagai batzuk sartzea iradokiko dugu.
dc.language.isoeus
dc.publisherServicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleAdorea, Filosofiatik Psikologiara
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.holder© 2018, Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko Argitalpen Zerbitzua
dc.identifier.doi10.1387/gogoa.20361


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record