Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHUBU-COVID-19 group
dc.contributor.authorAstigarraga Aguirre, María Iciar
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-15T13:35:44Z
dc.date.available2021-12-15T13:35:44Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Translational Autoimmunity 4 : (2021) // Article ID 100086es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2589-9090
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/54497
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: A growing evidence suggests that immune dysregulation and thrombotic phenomena are key features in the pathophysiology of COVID-19. Apart from antivirals and respiratory support, anticoagulants, corticoids and immunomodulators are increasingly being prescribed, especially for more severe cases. We describe the clinical outcome of a large cohort of patients preferentially treated with glucocorticoids and interleukin inhibitors. Methods: Single center and retrospective case series. Adult patients admitted with COVID-19 related respiratory insufficiency were included. Patients who died within 2 days after admission and those testing positive but asymptomatic were excluded. We defined two study periods: from March 3rd to March 31 st, 2020 (beginning of epidemic until peak of incidence) and April 1 st to May 7 th, 2020 (second half of epidemic). The majority of patients received respiratory support, combinations of antimicrobials, anticoagulants, corticoids and interleukin inhibitors. Antivirals were preferentially given in the first period. The clinical outcome (death and ventilator dependency) of both periods was compared. Results: From March 3 rd to May 7 th, 685 patients were included for analysis (58.4% males, mean age 68.9 years). Patients in the first period (n = 408) were younger (66.6 vs 71.1 years, p = 0.003), presented lower mean P a O2/FiO2 ratio at admission (256.5 vs 270.4 mm Hg,p = 0.0563), higher ferritin (1520 vs 1221 ng/ml, p = 0.01), higher IL-6 (679 vs 194 pg/ml, p < 0.0001) and similar D-dimer levels (3.59 vs 3.39 mu g/mL, p = 0.65) compared to the second period (n = 277). Lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon were preferentially given in the first period (23.8% and 32% vs 1.8% and 11.9%, p < 0.0001). Use of corticoids (88.2% vs 87.4%, p = 0,74) and tocilizumab (26.29 vs 20.22% p = 0.06) were similarly administered in both periods. Patients in the second period needed less mechanical ventilation (4.9% vs 16.9%, p < 0.0001), fewer ICU admission (6.1% vs 20.1%,p < 0.0001) and showed similar mortality (17.7% vs 15.4%, p = 0.43). Infectious and thrombotic complications were comparable in both periods (both around 8%, with no statistical difference). Patients treated with tocilizumab (n = 163) had lower mortality rate compared to those untreated under the same indication (7.9% vs 24.2%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In this large retrospective COVID-19 in-hospital cohort, lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon showed no significant impact on survival. Extensive use of corticosteroids and tocilizumab resulted in good overall outcome and showed acceptable complication rates.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectCOVID-19es_ES
dc.subjectepidemiologyes_ES
dc.subjectdiagnosis treatmentes_ES
dc.subjectimmunomodulationes_ES
dc.subjectrespiratory-distress-syndromees_ES
dc.subjectcytokine stormes_ES
dc.subjectsocietyes_ES
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2
dc.titleBenefits of early aggressive immunomodulatory therapy (tocilizumab and methylprednisolone) in COVID-19: Single center cohort study of 685 patientses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258990902100006X?via%3Dihubes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtauto.2021.100086
dc.departamentoesPediatríaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuPediatriaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)