Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPicallo Pérez, Ana ORCID
dc.contributor.authorSala Lizarraga, José María Pedro
dc.contributor.authorOdriozola Maritorena, Moisés ORCID
dc.contributor.authorHidalgo Betanzos, Juan María
dc.contributor.authorGómez Arriaran, Ignacio Santiago
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-27T15:11:54Z
dc.date.available2024-05-27T15:11:54Z
dc.date.issued2021-07
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Building Engineering 39 : (2021) // Article ID 102255es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2352-7102
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/68195
dc.description.abstractThis work analyses deeply and critically the behavior of a heat recovery device of the ventilation system, in a dwelling of the Basque Country, under the energy and the exergy point of view. The aim is to show the different results that come from both perspectives. Heating period was monitored and data of the velocities and temperatures of the extracted and renovation airflows have been registered. With the data recorded, the effectiveness, energy efficiency and exergy efficiency of the recovery system have been calculated. Later, energy savings, primary energy savings and economic savings have been evaluated. Besides, the minimum difference between the outdoor and the indoor temperatures, from which the operation of the recovery system achieves a primary energy saving, an economic saving or an exergy saving were calculated. In addition to the exhaustive monitoring, the concentration of carbon dioxide in each room of the dwelling has been measured. The results obtained show the convenience of using ventilation systems with heat recovery from an energy point of view (with an energy efficiency of 89%), but not so if an exergy analysis is performed (with an exergy efficiency of 4%). After all, Second Law perspective penalizes a lot the electricity consumption for heating purposes, requiring a temperature differences (between the indoor and outdoor temperatures) higher than 32 °C in order to obtain exergy savings (not so under the energy perspective, where a difference of 1.6 °C is enough for having savings). The indoor air quality analysis confirms the adequacy in terms of CO2 concentration. This work is pioneer in terms of deep exergy application for ventilation systems.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors acknowledge the support provided by the Laboratory for the Quality Control in Buildings of the Basque Government.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectheat recovery ventilation systemes_ES
dc.subjectenergy and exergy savingses_ES
dc.subjectthresholds temperaturees_ES
dc.subjectindoor air qualityes_ES
dc.titleVentilation of buildings with heat recovery systems: Thorough energy and exergy analysis for indoor thermal wellnesses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235271022100111Xes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102255
dc.departamentoesIngeniería Energéticaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuEnergia Ingenieritzaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).