Itemaren erregistro erraza erakusten du

dc.contributor.authorJose Beltrán Jiménez, José
dc.contributor.authorSalzano, Vincenzo
dc.contributor.authorLazcoz Sáez, Ruth ORCID
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-05T14:50:32Z
dc.date.available2016-05-05T14:50:32Z
dc.date.issued2015-02-04
dc.identifier.citationPhysics Letters B 741 : 168-177 (2015) // Article ID 2014.12.031es
dc.identifier.issn0370-2693
dc.identifier.issn1873-2445
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/18168
dc.description.abstractWe review the appropriateness of using SNIa observations to detect potential signatures of anisotropic expansion in the Universe. We focus on Union2 and SNLS3 SNIa datasets and use the hemispherical comparison method to detect possible anisotropic features. Unlike some previous works where nondiagonal elements of the covariance matrix were neglected, we use the full covariance matrix of the SNIa data, thus obtaining more realistic and not underestimated errors. As a matter of fact, the significance of previously claimed detections of a preferred direction in the Union2 dataset completely disappears once we include the effects of using the full covariance matrix. Moreover, we also find that such apreferred direction is aligned with the orthogonal direction of the SDSS observational plane and this suggests a clear indication that the SDSS subsample of the Union2 dataset introduces a significant bias, making the detected preferred direction unphysical. We thus find that current SNIa surveys are inappropriate to test anisotropic features due to their highly non-homogeneous angular distribution in the sky. In addition, after removal of the highest in homogeneous sub-samples, the number of SNIa is too low. Finally, we take advantage of the particular distribution of SNLS SNIa sub- sample in the SNLS3 data set, in which the observations were taken along four different directions. We fit each direction independently and find consistent results at the 1 sigma level. Although the likelihoods peak at relatively different values of Omega(m), the low number of data along each direction gives rise to large errors so that the likelihoods are sufficiently broad as to overlap within 1 sigma. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/).es
dc.description.sponsorshipJ.B.J. is supported by the Wallonia-Brussels Federation grant ARC No. 11/15-040 and also thanks support from the Spanish MICINN Consolider-Ingenio 2010 Programme under grant Multi-Dark CSD2009-00064 and project number FIS2011-23000. J.B.J. also wishes to acknowledges the Department of Theoretical Physics of the University of the Basque Country for their warm hospitality. V.S. and R.L. are supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through research projects FIS2010-15492 and Consolider EPI CSD2010-00064, and also by the Basque Government through research project GIC12/66, and by the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU under program UFI 11/55.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.subjectsupernova legacy surveyes
dc.subjectdark-energyes
dc.subjectIA supernovaees
dc.subjectlight curveses
dc.subjectconstraintses
dc.subjectuniversees
dc.subjectsearches
dc.titleAnisotropic expansion and SNIa: An open issuees
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2014 The Authors.Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAPes
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269314009022?np=yes
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.physletb.2014.12.031
dc.departamentoesFísica teórica e historia de la cienciaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuFisika teorikoa eta zientziaren historiaes_ES
dc.subject.categoriaPHYSICS, NUCLEAR


Item honetako fitxategiak

Thumbnail

Item hau honako bilduma honetan/hauetan agertzen da

Itemaren erregistro erraza erakusten du