“Hazy” or “jumbled”? Putting together the pieces of the bilingual puzzle
Ikusi/ Ireki
Data
2016Egilea
García-Pentón, Lorna
Fernández García, Yuriem
Costello, Brendan
Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni
Carreiras, Manuel
Lorna García-Pentón, Yuriem Fernández García, Brendan Costello, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia & Manuel Carreiras (2016) “Hazy” or “jumbled”? Putting together the pieces of the bilingual puzzle, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31:3, 353-360, DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1135247
Laburpena
Six commentaries [Bialystok, E. (2015). How hazy views become full pictures. Language, Cognition
and Neuroscience. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1074255; de Bruin, A., & Della Sala, S. (2015) The
importance of language use when studying the neuroanatomical basis of bilingualism. Language,
Cognition and Neuroscience. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1082608; Green, D. W., & Abutalebi,
J. (2015). Language control and the neuroanatomy of bilingualism: In praise of variety. Language,
Cognition and Neuroscience. doi:0.1080/23273798.2015.1084428; Kroll, J. and Chiarello, C. (2015).
Language experience and the brain: Variability, neuroplasticity, and bilingualism. Language,
Cognition and Neuroscience. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1086009; Luk, G., & Pliatsikas, C. (2015).
Converging diversity to unity: Commentary on the neuroanatomy of bilingualism. Language,
Cognition and Neuroscience; Paap, K. (2015). The neuroanatomy of bilingualism: Will winds of
change lift the fog? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1082607]
were produced in relation to the review “The neuroanatomy of bilingualism: How to turn a hazy
view into the full picture” (García-Pentón, L., Fernández, Y., Costello, B., Duñabeitia, J. A., &
Carreiras, M. (2015). The neuroanatomy of bilingualism: How to turn a hazy view into the full
picture. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1068944). In the
review, we argued that the available evidence for structural changes in bilingualism offers
ambiguous support for current neural models of bilingualism and that this shortcoming in the
field is exacerbated by critical methodological differences between studies. Thus, best practices
need to be established for studying and modelling bilingualism. The commentaries bring to the
discussion new perspectives and highlight additional challenges. Our response addresses the
issues raised under two broad topics: the need to connect structural findings with behavioural
and functional data, and a series of methodological concerns that are critical if the field is to
advance.