dc.contributor.author | Leminen, Alina | |
dc.contributor.author | Smolka, Eva | |
dc.contributor.author | Duñabeitia, Jon A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pliatsikas, Christos | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-15T08:12:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-15T08:12:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Alina Leminen, Eva Smolka, Jon A. Duñabeitia, Christos Pliatsikas, Morphological processing in the brain: The good (inflection), the bad (derivation) and the ugly (compounding), Cortex, Volume 116, 2019, Pages 4-44, ISSN 0010-9452, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016. | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0010-9452 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/34664 | |
dc.description | Available online 1 September 2018. | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | There is considerable behavioral evidence that morphologically complex words such as ‘tax-able’ and ‘kiss-es’ are processed and represented combinatorially. In other words, they are decomposed into their constituents ‘tax’ and ‘-able’ during comprehension (reading or listening), and producing them might also involve on–the–spot combination of these constituents (especially for inflections). However, despite increasing amount of neurocognitive research, the neural mechanisms underlying these processes are still not fully understood. The purpose of this critical review is to offer a comprehensive overview on the state-of-the-art of the research on the neural mechanisms of morphological processing. In order to take into account all types of complex words, we include findings on inflected, derived, and compound words presented both visually and aurally. More specifically, we cover a wide range of electro- and magnetoencephalography (EEG and MEG, respectively) as well as structural/functional magnetic resonance imaging (s/fMRI) studies that focus on morphological processing. We present the findings with respect to the temporal course and localization of morphologically complex word processing. We summarize the observed findings, their interpretations with respect to current psycholinguistic models, and discuss methodological approaches as well as their possible limitations. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This study was supported by Kone Foundation and Helsinki
University Research Grants to Alina Leminen, by the Volkswagen
Foundation, Grant FP 561/11 to Eva Smolka, PSI2015-
65689-P and SEV-2015-0490 from the Spanish Government (Jon
Andoni Du~nabeitia). | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Cortex | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/PSI2015-65689-P | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/SEV-2015-0490 | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | Morphology | es_ES |
dc.subject | Compounding | es_ES |
dc.subject | Derivation | es_ES |
dc.subject | Inflection | es_ES |
dc.subject | Neuroimaging | es_ES |
dc.title | Morphological processing in the brain: The good (inflection), the bad (derivation) and the ugly (compounding) | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by/4.0/). | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | www.elsevier.com/locate/cortex | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016 | |