Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeminen, Alina
dc.contributor.authorSmolka, Eva
dc.contributor.authorDuñabeitia, Jon A.
dc.contributor.authorPliatsikas, Christos
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-15T08:12:05Z
dc.date.available2019-07-15T08:12:05Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationAlina Leminen, Eva Smolka, Jon A. Duñabeitia, Christos Pliatsikas, Morphological processing in the brain: The good (inflection), the bad (derivation) and the ugly (compounding), Cortex, Volume 116, 2019, Pages 4-44, ISSN 0010-9452, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0010-9452
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/34664
dc.descriptionAvailable online 1 September 2018.es_ES
dc.description.abstractThere is considerable behavioral evidence that morphologically complex words such as ‘tax-able’ and ‘kiss-es’ are processed and represented combinatorially. In other words, they are decomposed into their constituents ‘tax’ and ‘-able’ during comprehension (reading or listening), and producing them might also involve on–the–spot combination of these constituents (especially for inflections). However, despite increasing amount of neurocognitive research, the neural mechanisms underlying these processes are still not fully understood. The purpose of this critical review is to offer a comprehensive overview on the state-of-the-art of the research on the neural mechanisms of morphological processing. In order to take into account all types of complex words, we include findings on inflected, derived, and compound words presented both visually and aurally. More specifically, we cover a wide range of electro- and magnetoencephalography (EEG and MEG, respectively) as well as structural/functional magnetic resonance imaging (s/fMRI) studies that focus on morphological processing. We present the findings with respect to the temporal course and localization of morphologically complex word processing. We summarize the observed findings, their interpretations with respect to current psycholinguistic models, and discuss methodological approaches as well as their possible limitations.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by Kone Foundation and Helsinki University Research Grants to Alina Leminen, by the Volkswagen Foundation, Grant FP 561/11 to Eva Smolka, PSI2015- 65689-P and SEV-2015-0490 from the Spanish Government (Jon Andoni Du~nabeitia).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherCortexes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/PSI2015-65689-Pes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/SEV-2015-0490es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectMorphologyes_ES
dc.subjectCompoundinges_ES
dc.subjectDerivationes_ES
dc.subjectInflectiones_ES
dc.subjectNeuroimaginges_ES
dc.titleMorphological processing in the brain: The good (inflection), the bad (derivation) and the ugly (compounding)es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/).es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionwww.elsevier.com/locate/cortexes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record