Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVan de Ven, Dirk-Jan Petrus Adrianus
dc.contributor.authorSampedro Martínez de Estívariz, Jon
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Francis Xavier
dc.contributor.authorBailis, Rob
dc.contributor.authorForouli, Aikaterini
dc.contributor.authorNikas, Alexandros
dc.contributor.authorYu, Sha
dc.contributor.authorPardo, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorGarcía de Jalón, Silvestre
dc.contributor.authorWise, Marshall
dc.contributor.authorDoukas, Haris
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-30T09:25:33Z
dc.date.available2019-12-30T09:25:33Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-20
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Research Letters 14(9) : (2019) // Article ID 094001es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1748-9326
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/37403
dc.description.abstractHeavy reliance on traditional biomass for household energy in eastern Africa has significant negative health and environmental impacts. The African context for energy access is rather different from historical experiences elsewhere as challenges in achieving energy access have coincided with major climate ambitions. Policies focusing on household energy needs in eastern Africa contribute to at least three sustainable development goals (SDGs): climate action, good health, and improved energy access. This study uses an integrated assessment model to simulate the impact of land policies and technology subsidies, as well as the interaction of both, on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, exposure to air pollution and energy access in eastern Africa under a range of socioeconomic pathways. We find that land policies focusing on increasing the sustainable output of biomass resources can reduce GHG emissions in the region by about 10%, but also slightly delay progress in health and energy access goals. An optimised portfolio of energy technology subsidies consistent with a global Green Climate Funds budget of 30-35 billion dollar, can yield another 10% savings in GHG emissions, while decreasing mortality related to air pollution by 20%, and improving energy access by up to 15%. After 2030, both land and technology policies become less effective, and more dependent on the overall development path of the region. The analysis shows that support for biogas technology should be prioritised in both the short and long term, while financing liquefied petroleum gas and ethanol technologies also has synergetic climate, health and energy access benefits. Instead, financing PV technologies is mostly relevant for improving energy access, while charcoal and to a lesser extend fuelwood technologies are relevant for curbing GHG emissions if their finance is linked to land policies. We suggest that integrated policy analysis is needed in the African context for simultaneously reaching progress in multiple SDGs.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank Francesco Dalla Longa for his comments, and Brennan Bowman and Sebastien Huclin for their help with regard to data and methodology. This research is supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant Agreements No. 642260 (TRANSrisk project) and No. 820846 (Paris Reinforce), and by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness MINECO through BC3 Maria de Maeztu excellence accreditation MDM-2017-0714. Dirk-Jan van de Ven and Jon Sampedro acknowledge financial support from the Ministry of the Economy and Competitiveness of Spain (ECO2015-68023). Jon Sampedro also acknowledges financial support from the Basque Government (PRE_2018_2_0076). Sha Yu was supported by the Global Technology Strategy Project (GTSP). The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherIOPes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/642260es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/820846es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/MDM-2017-0714es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/ECO2015-68023es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectsustainable development goalses_ES
dc.subjectclean cooking stoveses_ES
dc.subjectenergy accesses_ES
dc.subjecthousehold air pollutiones_ES
dc.subjectclimate financees_ES
dc.subjectcharcoal productiones_ES
dc.subjecthousehold energyes_ES
dc.subjectclean fuelses_ES
dc.subjectbiogases_ES
dc.subjecttechnologyes_ES
dc.subjecttransitiones_ES
dc.subjectbarrierses_ES
dc.subjectTanzaniaes_ES
dc.subjectadoptiones_ES
dc.titleIntegrated policy assessment and optimisation over multiple sustainable development goals in Eastern Africaes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holderOriginal content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab375des_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1748-9326/ab375d
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission
dc.departamentoesFundamentos del análisis económico Ies_ES
dc.departamentoeuEkonomia analisiaren oinarriak Ies_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.