Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrigg, Roman
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-29T15:29:17Z
dc.date.available2020-01-29T15:29:17Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationTheoria 21(1) : 49-66 (2006)
dc.identifier.issn2171-679X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/39307
dc.description.abstractIt is now part and parcel of the official philosophical wisdom that models are essential to the acquisition and organisation of scientific knowledge. It is also generally accepted that most models represent their target systems in one way or another. But what does it mean for a model to represent its target system? I begin by introducing three conundrums that a theory of scientific representation has to come to terms with and then address the question of whether the semantic view of theories, which is the currently most widely accepted account of theories and models, provides us with adequate answers to these questions. After having argued in some detail that it does not, I conclude by pointing out in what direction a tenable account of scientific representation might be sought.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherServicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleScientific Representation and the Semantic View of Theories
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.holder© 2006, Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko Argitalpen Zerbitzua


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record