Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDiez-Cañamero, Borja
dc.contributor.authorBishara, Tania
dc.contributor.authorOtegi Olaso, José Ramón ORCID
dc.contributor.authorMínguez Gabiña, Rikardo ORCID
dc.contributor.authorFernández, José María
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-27T18:49:56Z
dc.date.available2020-03-27T18:49:56Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-10
dc.identifier.citationSustainability 12(5) : (2020) // Article ID 2153es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/42456
dc.description.abstractCompanies are currently changing their traditional role in society and transforming it into a proactive role in which their operations generate social and environmental positive impacts. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has evolved from simple philanthropy to a more theoretical concept with a new corporate philosophy that takes all the interests of all stakeholders into consideration. The financial market is pushing the development of Socially Responsible Investment (SRI), which has led to the rise of Corporate Sustainability Systems (CSS). These CSSs are tools that rate corporate performance on sustainability. However, they constitute a chaotic universe, with instruments of different nature. This paper identifies and groups the common characteristics of the CSSs into three different typologies: Indexes, Rankings and Ratings. Despite this classification, and although the fundamental pillar of CSR is the “Stakeholder Theory”, CSSs are still not ideal tools to be used by all stakeholders. From the magma of CSSs, this article identifies and describes, through a comparative analysis, those which best comply with the “Stakeholder Theory”. This paper facilitates the work of researchers and stakeholders by exposing the differential characteristics of the most important CSSs.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was founded by IHOBE, Environmental Management Public Agency of the Basque Government, and was carried out in collaboration with the Department of Graphic Design and Engineering Projects of the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.subjectCorporate Social Responsibility (CSR)es_ES
dc.subjectSocially Responsible Investment (SRI)es_ES
dc.subjectEnvironment, Social and Governance Criterion (ESG)es_ES
dc.subjectStakeholder Theoryes_ES
dc.subjectsustainability indexeses_ES
dc.subjectsustainability rankingses_ES
dc.subjectsustainability ratingses_ES
dc.subjectESG performancees_ES
dc.subjectsustainability performancees_ES
dc.subjectcorporate sustainable systemes_ES
dc.titleMeasurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Corporate Sustainability Indexes, Rankings and Ratingses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.date.updated2020-03-13T13:10:16Z
dc.rights.holder© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/2153es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su12052153
dc.departamentoesExpresión gráfica y proyectos de ingeniería
dc.departamentoeuAdierazpen grafikoa eta ingeniaritzako proiektuak


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).