dc.contributor.author | Palomo, I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dujardin, Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | Midler, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Robin, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sanz, M.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pascual, U. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-18T11:03:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-18T11:03:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of; America: 116(45) : 22645-22650 (2019) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0027-8424 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/44039 | |
dc.description.abstract | The program on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) is one of the major attempts to tackle climate change mitigation in developing countries. REDD+ seeks to provide result-based incentives to promote emission reductions and increase carbon sinks in forest land while promoting other cobenefits, such as the conservation of biodiversity. We model different scenarios of international REDD+ funds distribution toward potential recipient countries using 2 carbon emission reduction targets (20% and 50% compared to the baseline scenario, i.e., deforestation and forest degradation without REDD+) by 2030. The model combines the prioritization of environmental outcomes in terms of carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation and social equity, accounting for the equitable distribution of international REDD+ funds. Results highlight the synergy between carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation under alternative fund allocation criteria, especially for scenarios of low carbon emission reduction. Trade-offs increase when distributional equity is considered as an additional criterion, especially under higher equity requirements. The analysis helps to better understand the inherent trade-offs between enhancing distributional equity and meeting environmental targets under alternative REDD+ fund allocation options. (c) 2019 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | I.P. is supported by a grant by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (IJCI-2016–28475). I.P., U.P., and M.J.S. are supported under the Basque Centre for Climate Change “Unit of Excellence” (Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness; MDM-2017-0714). | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | National Academy of Sciences | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/IJCI-2016–28475 | |
dc.relation | ES/6PN/IJCI-2016–28475 | |
dc.relation | ES/6PN/IJCI-2016–28475 | |
dc.relation | EUS/BERC/BERC.2018-2021 | |
dc.relation | ES/1PE/MDM-2017-0714 | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/MDM-2017-0714 | |
dc.relation.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908683116 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.title | Modeling trade-offs across carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and equity in the distribution of global REDD+ funds | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.rights.holder | (c) 2019 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1073/pnas.1908683116 | |