Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPalomo, I.
dc.contributor.authorDujardin, Y.
dc.contributor.authorMidler, E.
dc.contributor.authorRobin, M.
dc.contributor.authorSanz, M.J.
dc.contributor.authorPascual, U.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-18T11:03:19Z
dc.date.available2020-06-18T11:03:19Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationProceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of; America: 116(45) : 22645-22650 (2019)
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/44039
dc.description.abstractThe program on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) is one of the major attempts to tackle climate change mitigation in developing countries. REDD+ seeks to provide result-based incentives to promote emission reductions and increase carbon sinks in forest land while promoting other cobenefits, such as the conservation of biodiversity. We model different scenarios of international REDD+ funds distribution toward potential recipient countries using 2 carbon emission reduction targets (20% and 50% compared to the baseline scenario, i.e., deforestation and forest degradation without REDD+) by 2030. The model combines the prioritization of environmental outcomes in terms of carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation and social equity, accounting for the equitable distribution of international REDD+ funds. Results highlight the synergy between carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation under alternative fund allocation criteria, especially for scenarios of low carbon emission reduction. Trade-offs increase when distributional equity is considered as an additional criterion, especially under higher equity requirements. The analysis helps to better understand the inherent trade-offs between enhancing distributional equity and meeting environmental targets under alternative REDD+ fund allocation options. (c) 2019 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
dc.description.sponsorshipI.P. is supported by a grant by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (IJCI-2016–28475). I.P., U.P., and M.J.S. are supported under the Basque Centre for Climate Change “Unit of Excellence” (Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness; MDM-2017-0714).
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNational Academy of Sciences
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/IJCI-2016–28475
dc.relationES/6PN/IJCI-2016–28475
dc.relationES/6PN/IJCI-2016–28475
dc.relationEUS/BERC/BERC.2018-2021
dc.relationES/1PE/MDM-2017-0714
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/MDM-2017-0714
dc.relation.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908683116
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleModeling trade-offs across carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and equity in the distribution of global REDD+ funds
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.holder(c) 2019 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.1908683116


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record