Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Nieto, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorHuland, E.
dc.contributor.authorQuintas-Soriano, C.
dc.contributor.authorIniesta-Arandia, I.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Llorente, M.
dc.contributor.authorPalomo, I.
dc.contributor.authorMartín-López, B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-23T09:45:01Z
dc.date.available2020-06-23T09:45:01Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationEcosystems And People 15(1) : 257-268 (2019)
dc.identifier.issn2639-5908
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/44201
dc.description.abstractRecent studies have shown the opportunities and limitations of participatory mapping for ecosystem services management, although it is an incipient research area. One of the research questions yet to be addressed is whether the composition of stakeholder groups has an effect on the outputs of participatory mapping. In this study, we assessed the influence of group composition on the mapped spatial distribution of ecosystem services. We developed two participatory mapping workshops of the ecosystem service supply and demand in the Nacimiento Watershed (Andalusia, Spain). In workshop 1, stakeholders were uniformly grouped according to their level of influence on land management. In workshop 2, we created mixed groups, with participants having dissimilar levels of influence on land management. The strategy of the second workshop aimed to foster social learning among participants, which was expected to influence the mapping outputs. We compared the outputs regarding the mapped spatial distribution of the ecosystem service supply and demand between the two workshops. Our results suggest that social learning occurred in groups with a mixed composition of participants, affecting the mapped spatial distribution of the supply and demand of ecosystem services. Finally, we discuss that knowledge exchange among participants can be supported through deliberative processes that occur in participatory settings, when stakeholders have different degrees of influence on land management. This can also enrich the assessment of the distribution of ecosystem services. © 2019, © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis Group.
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding for the development of this research was provided by the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Commission (FP7, 2007–2013) under the OpenNESS Project (Operationalization of Natural capital and Ecosystem Services: From concepts to real-world applications; Contract No. 308428). IIA acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Sciences, Innovation and Universities, through the “Juan de la Cierva-Incorporación” program (Grant IJCI-2017-33405) and the “María de Maeztu” program for Units of Excellence (MDM-2015-0552). IP was funded by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain (Grant FJCI-2014-20236).
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/FJCI-2014-20236
dc.relationES/6PN/FJCI-2014-20236
dc.relation.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1667875
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/
dc.titleEvaluating social learning in participatory mapping of ecosystem services
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.holder(c) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis Group.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/26395916.2019.1667875


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

(c) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis Group.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as (c) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis Group.