Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYang, J.
dc.contributor.authorDuursma, R.A.
dc.contributor.authorDe Kauwe, M.G.
dc.contributor.authorKumarathunge, D
dc.contributor.authorJiang, M
dc.contributor.authorMahmud, K
dc.contributor.authorGimeno, T.E.
dc.contributor.authorCrous, K.Y.
dc.contributor.authorEllsworth, D.S.
dc.contributor.authorPeters, J
dc.contributor.authorChoat, B
dc.contributor.authorEamus, D
dc.contributor.authorMedlyn, B.E.
dc.date2020-12-01
dc.date2020-12-01
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-26T15:36:50Z
dc.date.available2020-10-26T15:36:50Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationTree Physiology: 39 (12): 1961-1974 (2019)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1758-4469
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/47288
dc.description.abstractVapour pressure deficit (D) is projected to increase in the future as temperature rises. In response to increased D, stomatal conductance (gs) and photosynthesis (A) are reduced, which may result in significant reductions in terrestrial carbon, water and energy fluxes. It is thus important for gas exchange models to capture the observed responses of gs and A with increasing D. We tested a series of coupled A-gs models against leaf gas exchange measurements from the Cumberland Plain Woodland (Australia), where D regularly exceeds 2 kPa and can reach 8 kPa in summer. Two commonly used A-gs models were not able to capture the observed decrease in A and gs with increasing D at the leaf scale. To explain this decrease in A and gs, two alternative hypotheses were tested: hydraulic limitation (i.e., plants reduce gs and/or A due to insufficient water supply) and non-stomatal limitation (i.e., downregulation of photosynthetic capacity). We found that the model that incorporated a non-stomatal limitation captured the observations with high fidelity and required the fewest number of parameters. Whilst the model incorporating hydraulic limitation captured the observed A and gs, it did so via a physical mechanism that is incorrect. We then incorporated a non-stomatal limitation into the stand model, MAESPA, to examine its impact on canopy transpiration and gross primary production. Accounting for a non-stomatal limitation reduced the predicted transpiration by ~19%, improving the correspondence with sap flow measurements, and gross primary production by ~14%. Given the projected global increases in D associated with future warming, these findings suggest that models may need to incorporate non-stomatal limitation to accurately simulate A and gs in the future with high D. Further data on non-stomatal limitation at high D should be a priority, in order to determine the generality of our results and develop a widely applicable model. © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipJ.Y. was supported by a PhD scholarship from Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University. M.G.D.K. acknowledges funding from the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes (CE170100023), the ARC Discovery Grant (DP190101823) and support from the NSW Research Attraction and Acceleration Program. EucFACE was built as an initiative of the Australian Government as part of the Nation-building Economic Stimulus Package and is supported by the Australian Commonwealth in collaboration with Western Sydney University. It is also part of a Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network Super-site facility.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherOxford University Presses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectalternative hypothesises_ES
dc.subjectAustraliaes_ES
dc.subjectcanopyes_ES
dc.subjectdown regulationes_ES
dc.subjectflow measurementes_ES
dc.subjectleaf gas exchangees_ES
dc.subjectphotosynthesises_ES
dc.subjectsap flowes_ES
dc.subjectstomatal conductancees_ES
dc.subjectsummeres_ES
dc.subjectsweatinges_ES
dc.subjectvapor pressurees_ES
dc.subjectwarminges_ES
dc.subjectwater supplyes_ES
dc.subjectwritinges_ES
dc.titleIncorporating non-stomatal limitation improves the performance of leaf and canopy models at high vapour pressure deficites_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reservedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpz103es_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record