Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPolyanskaya, Leona
dc.contributor.authorManrique, Héctor M.
dc.contributor.authorSamuel, Arthur G.
dc.contributor.authorMarín, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Palacios, Azucena
dc.contributor.authorOrdin, Mikhail
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-04T09:28:14Z
dc.date.available2022-10-04T09:28:14Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationPolyanskaya, L., Manrique, H.M., Samuel, A.G., Marín, A., García-Palacios, A. and Ordin, M. (2022), Intermodality differences in statistical learning: phylogenetic and ontogenetic influences. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1511: 191-209. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14749es_ES
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
dc.identifier.issn0077-8923
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/57903
dc.descriptionFirst published: 05 February 2022es_ES
dc.description.abstractIn Basque–Spanish bilinguals, statistical learning (SL) in the visual modality was more efficient on nonlinguistic than linguistic input; in the auditory modality, we found the reverse pattern of results.We hypothesize that SL was shaped for processing nonlinguistic environmental stimuli and only later, as the language faculty emerged, recycled for speech processing. This led to further adaptive changes in the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying speech processing, including SL. By contrast, as a recent cultural innovation, written language has not yet led to adaptations. The current study investigated whether such phylogenetic influences on SL can bemodulated by ontogenetic influences on a shorter timescale, over the course of individual development.We explored how SL is modulated by the ambient linguistic environment.We found that SL in the auditory modality can be further modulated by exposure to a bilingual environment, in which speakers need to process a wider range of diverse speech cues. This effect was observed only on linguistic, not nonlinguistic, material. We conclude that ontogenetic factors modulate the efficiency of already existing SL ability, honing it for specific types of input, by providing new targets for selection via exposure to different cues in the sensory input.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWILEYes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectstatistical learninges_ES
dc.subjectredeploymentes_ES
dc.subjectadaptationes_ES
dc.subjectontogenetic influenceses_ES
dc.subjectphylogenetic influenceses_ES
dc.subjectpositional memoryes_ES
dc.subjecttransitional probabilitieses_ES
dc.subjectnature-nurturees_ES
dc.subjectmodality-specificityes_ES
dc.subjectdomain-specificityes_ES
dc.titleIntermodality differences in statistical learning: phylogenetic and ontogenetic influenceses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposeses_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17496632es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nyas.14749


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record