Rhythms in cognition: The evidence revisited
Data
2022Egilea
Keitel, Christian
Ruzzoli, Manuela
Dugué, Laura
Busch, Niko A.
Benwell, Christopher S. Y.
Keitel, C., Ruzzoli, M., Dugué, L., Busch, N. A., & Benwell, C. S. Y. (2022). Rhythms in cognition: The evidence revisited. European Journal of Neuroscience, 55( 11–12), 2991– 3009. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15740
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience
Laburpena
Brain activity abounds with rhythmic patterns (Capilla et al., 2021; Groppe et al., 2013; Keitel & Gross, 2016) that reflect ongoing fluctuations of neuronal excitability (Adrian & Matthews, 1934; Bishop, 1932). These rhythms can be described as oscillations that cycle through phases at specific frequencies and with a certain strength or amplitude (Figure 1). Attempts to account for the functional relevance of rhythms have gone from associating cognitive function X with rhythmic activity Y to a more comprehensive understanding of the role of brain rhythms in human everyday experience and behaviour (Buzsáki & Draguhn, 2004; Fries, 2015; Lakatos et al., 2019; Wang, 2010). These accounts support a simple, yet fundamental idea: Cognitive functions themselves may be intrinsically rhythmic.