Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLanda Bilbao, Leire
dc.contributor.authorValecillos Díaz, José del Rosario
dc.contributor.authorRemiro Eguskiza, Aingeru
dc.contributor.authorValle Pascual, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorBilbao Elorriaga, Javier
dc.contributor.authorGayubo Cazorla, Ana Guadalupe
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T17:34:40Z
dc.date.available2023-03-06T17:34:40Z
dc.date.issued2023-02
dc.identifier.citationChemical Engineering Journal 458 : (2023) // Article ID 141494es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1385-8947
dc.identifier.issn1873-3212
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/60289
dc.description.abstractThe choice of appropriate reactors and reforming strategies is key to make progresses on scaling up H2 production processes from raw bio-oil. This work compares the performance (conversion, product yields and deactivation) of packed-bed and fluidized-bed reactors (PBR and FBR, respectively) using a NiAl2O4 spinel derived catalyst for the H2 production from raw bio-oil via steam reforming (SR) and sorption enhanced SR (SESR, with dolomite to capture CO2). The experiments were carried out at 600 °C; steam/carbon ratio, 3.4; space time, 0.15 h; time on stream, 5 h; dolomite/catalyst ratio, 10 (SESR runs); and with prior thermal separation of the pyrolytic lignin from the raw bio-oil. The initial H2 yields are 80 % and 69 % in the SR runs with PBR and FBR, respectively, and 99 % and 92 % in the CO2 capture period (of 30 min duration) of the SESR runs in the PBR and FBR, respectively. The lower H2 yield in the FBR is due to the less efficient gas–solid contact (bubbling or slugging phenomena). Based on the analysis of the spent catalysts with varied techniques the catalyst deactivation is related to the coke deposition, whose quantity and nature (amorphous or structured) depends on the reactor type and reforming strategy. The catalyst deactivation is slower in the FBR due to the rejuvenation of the catalyst surface by the moving particles that favor external coke gasification. The presence of dolomite prolongs the period of stable catalyst activity in both reactors with different effects on the coke quantity and nature. The results are of interest to advance on scaling up the SESR process that would require a FBR integrated with a regeneration unit for the catalyst and sorbent.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work has been carried out with the financial support of the grant RTI2018-100771-B-I00 and PID2021-127005OB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by “ERDF A way of making Europe”, the European Commission (HORIZON H2020-MSCA RISE 2018. Contract No. 823745) and the Department of Education, Universities and Investigation of Basque Government (Project IT1645-22 and PhD grant PRE_2021_2_0147 for L. Landa). The authors thank for technical and human support provided by SGIker (UPV/EHU/ERDF, EU), and to Calcinor S.A. for supplying the dolomite.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/823745es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN/2021-127005OB-I00es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICIU/RTI2018-100771-B-I00es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectraw bio-oil reforminges_ES
dc.subjecthydrogenes_ES
dc.subjectCO2 capturees_ES
dc.subjectcoke deactivationes_ES
dc.subjectpacked-bed reactores_ES
dc.subjectfluidized-bed reactores_ES
dc.titleComparison of the NiAl2O4 derived catalyst deactivation in the steam reforming and sorption enhanced steam reforming of raw bio-oil in packed and fluidized-bed reactorses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/).es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385894723002255?via%3Dihubes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cej.2023.141494
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission
dc.departamentoesIngeniería químicaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuIngeniaritza kimikoaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-
nc-nd/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/).