Fieldwork ‘headaches’. comparing feminist peace and conflict research in Kosovo and the DRC
Ikusi/ Ireki
Data
2022Egilea
Mujika Chao, Itziar
Zirion Landaluze, Iker
Athenea Digital 22(2) : (2022) // Article ID e3015
Laburpena
This paper aims to reflect upon the principal difficulties, challenges or ‘headaches’
that doing feminist research in conflict and post-conflict contexts can involve.
Each of the authors has conducted a very different study. One, on the role of local
women’s organizations and activists in peacebuilding; the other, on the disarma-
ment and reintegration of combatants and the impact of this process on the repro-
duction of violence. While one of us is a woman, the other is a man. While one
studies feminist activism, the other focuses mainly on masculinities in the milit-
ary. While one has researched in Kosovo, the other has done so in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo. Based on these two research processes, we reflect on de-
bates over epistemological and practical issues such as reflexivity, positionality of
the researcher, access, secrecy and silence in the research process, power relations
in the field and ethical dilemmas