Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJebari, A.
dc.contributor.authorAlvaro-Fuentes, J.
dc.contributor.authorPardo, G.
dc.contributor.authorAlmagro, M.
dc.contributor.authordel Prado, A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-29T11:06:30Z
dc.date.available2023-08-29T11:06:30Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-01
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE: 16 (8 August) (2021)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/62265
dc.description.abstractTemperate grassland soils store significant amounts of carbon (C). Estimating how much livestock grazing and manuring can influence grassland soil organic carbon (SOC) is key to improve greenhouse gas grassland budgets. The Rothamsted Carbon (RothC) model, although originally developed and parameterized to model the turnover of organic C in arable topsoil, has been widely used, with varied success, to estimate SOC changes in grassland under different climates, soils, and management conditions. In this paper, we hypothesise that RothC-based SOC predictions in managed grasslands under temperate moist climatic conditions can be improved by incorporating small modifications to the model based on existing field data from diverse experimental locations in Europe. For this, we described and evaluated changes at the level of: (1) the soil water function of RothC, (2) entry pools accounting for the degradability of the exogenous organic matter (EOM) applied (e.g., ruminant excreta), (3) the month-on-month change in the quality of C inputs coming from plant residues (i.e above-, below-ground plant residue and rhizodeposits), and (4) the livestock trampling effect (i.e., poaching damage) as a common problem in areas with higher annual precipitation. In order to evaluate the potential utility of these changes, we performed a simple sensitivity analysis and tested the model predictions against averaged data from four grassland experiments in Europe. Our evaluation showed that the default model's performance was 78% and whereas some of the modifications seemed to improve RothC SOC predictions (model performance of 95% and 86% for soil water function and plant residues, respectively), others did not lead to any/or almost any improvement (model performance of 80 and 46% for the change in the C input quality and livestock trampling, respectively). We concluded that, whereas adding more complexity to the RothC model by adding the livestock trampling would actually not improve the model, adding the modified soil water function and plant residue components, and at a lesser extent residues quality, could improve predictability of the RothC in managed grasslands under temperate moist climatic conditions. © 2021 Jebari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Fundación Cándido de Iturriaga y Maria del Dañobeitia, Juan de la Cierva and the European Uniones_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherPLoS ONEes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectbiodegradabilityes_ES
dc.subjectbioremediationes_ES
dc.subjectclimate changees_ES
dc.subjectemotionalityes_ES
dc.subjectfood industryes_ES
dc.subjectgrasslandes_ES
dc.subjectgrazinges_ES
dc.subjectgreenhouse gases_ES
dc.subjecthospital mortalityes_ES
dc.subjectlivestockes_ES
dc.subjectmachine learninges_ES
dc.subjectmoisturees_ES
dc.subjectphotosynthesises_ES
dc.subjectplant heightes_ES
dc.subjectplant residuees_ES
dc.subjectprecipitationes_ES
dc.subjectpredictiones_ES
dc.subjectrhizospherees_ES
dc.subjectsensitivity analysises_ES
dc.subjectsimulationes_ES
dc.titleEstimating soil organic carbon changes in managed temperate moist grasslands with RothCes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2021 Jebari et al.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256219es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0256219
dc.contributor.funderFundación Cándido de Iturriaga y Maria del Dañobeitia
dc.contributor.funderJuan de la Cierva
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Union


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 Jebari et al.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2021 Jebari et al.