Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMariel, Petr ORCID
dc.contributor.authorArtabe, Alaitz ORCID
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-29T09:08:29Z
dc.date.available2024-01-29T09:08:29Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-28
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Environmental Economics and Management 103 : ( 2020) // Article ID 102363es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0095-0696
dc.identifier.issn1096-0449
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/64404
dc.description.abstractThe random parameter logit (RPL) model with uncorrelated coefficients is a restrictive version of the mixed logit model, but it is one of the most frequently used models for analysing stated choice data in environmental valuation. The body of applied literature using a more flexible version, the RPL model with correlated coefficients, has been noticeably growing in the last years, but it has still been used less frequently due to its computational complexity and non- trivial interpretation. The correlation matrix of the coefficients in this model captures not only the correlation due to a behavioural phenomenon but also the correlation caused by scale heterogeneity. These two effects cannot be identified empirically. Nevertheless, this paper proposes a simple procedure that enables an interpretation of some of the estimated correlations, which can help to disentangle the unobserved preference heterogeneity. The proposed procedure consists of two simple steps. Firstly, the signs of the attributes corresponding to the utility coefficients that have a negative mean coefficient are reversed. Secondly, only negative correlations are interpreted. We propose a theoretical model accounting for correlations induced both by hypothetical behavioural phenomena and by scale heterogeneity and apply the proposed procedure to three typical cases of environmental valuation.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors are grateful the FEDER/Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through grant ECO2017-82111-R and the Basque Government through grants IT-642- 13 (UPV/EHU Econometrics Research Group) and IT783-13. The data have been obtained through collaboration of the IHOBE (Basque Environmental Agency) and the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) through the research project 2008.0101 (UPV/EHU) and under the agreement between Diputación Foral de Álava and the University of the Basque Country (Ref: 2010-2970).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectcorrelated parameterses_ES
dc.subjectrandom parameter logites_ES
dc.subjectscale heterogeneityes_ES
dc.subjectchoice experimentes_ES
dc.titleInterpreting correlated random parameters in choice experimentses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2020 Elsevier Inc. under CC BY-NC-ND licence (https://creativecommons.org/license/by-nc-nd/4.0/)es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069620300863?via%3Dihubes_ES
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102363
dc.departamentoesEconomía aplicada III (Econometría y Estadística)es_ES
dc.departamentoeuEkonomia aplikatua III (ekonometria eta estatistika)es_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 Elsevier Inc. under CC BY-NC-ND licence (https://creativecommons.org/license/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020 Elsevier Inc. under CC BY-NC-ND licence (https://creativecommons.org/license/by-nc-nd/4.0/)