Sensorimotor brain–computer interface performance depends on signal-to-noise ratio but not connectivity of the mu rhythm in a multiverse analysis of longitudinal data
Date
2024Author
Kapralov, Nikolai
Idaji, Mina Jamshidi
Stephani, Tilman
Studenova, Alina
Vidaurre, Carmen
Ros, Tomas
Villringer, Arno
Nikulim, Vadim
Metadata
Show full item record
Kapralov, N., Idaji, M.J., Stephani, T., Studenova, N., Vidaurre, C., Ros, T., Villringer, A., & Nikulin, V. (2024). Sensorimotor brain–computer interface performance depends on signal-to-noise ratio but not connectivity of the mu rhythm in a multiverse analysis of longitudinal data. Journal Of Neural Engineering, 21:056027. Doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad7a24
Journal of Neural Engineering
Journal of Neural Engineering
Abstract
Objective. Serving as a channel for communication with locked-in patients or control of prostheses,
sensorimotor brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) decode imaginary movements from the recorded
activity of the user’s brain. However, many individuals remain unable to control the BCI, and the
underlying mechanisms are unclear. The user’s BCI performance was previously shown to correlate
with the resting-state signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the mu rhythm and the phase synchronization
(PS) of the mu rhythm between sensorimotor areas. Yet, these predictors of performance were
primarily evaluated in a single BCI session, while the longitudinal aspect remains rather
uninvestigated. In addition, different analysis pipelines were used to estimate PS in source space,
potentially hindering the reproducibility of the results. Approach. To systematically address these
issues, we performed an extensive validation of the relationship between pre-stimulus SNR, PS,
and session-wise BCI performance using a publicly available dataset of 62 human participants
performing up to 11 sessions of BCI training. We performed the analysis in sensor space using the
surface Laplacian and in source space by combining 24 processing pipelines in a multiverse
analysis. This way, we could investigate how robust the observed effects were to the selection of the
pipeline. Main results. Our results show that SNR had both between- and within-subject effects on
BCI performance for the majority of the pipelines. In contrast, the effect of PS on BCI performance
was less robust to the selection of the pipeline and became non-significant after controlling for
SNR. Significance. Taken together, our results demonstrate that changes in neuronal connectivity
within the sensorimotor system are not critical for learning to control a BCI, and interventions that
increase the SNR of the mu rhythm might lead to improvements in the user’s BCI performance.