dc.contributor.author | Korta Carrión, Kepa | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-06T16:33:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-06T16:33:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Gogoa 8(1) : 87-94 (2008) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1577-9424 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/46508 | |
dc.description.abstract | In "Literal meaning", Franfois Recanati argues for contextualism on utterance meaning and content, against literalism, indexicalism and syncretic views. A widely held assumption among participants in the debate is the thesis I call 'monopropositionalism,' that is, the view that the utterance of a non-ambiguous sentence is associated with one and only one proposition (implicatures apart).The only position apparently incompatible with monopropositionalism seems to be the syncretic view, a view that Recanati rejects. However, he doesn't embrace monopropositionalism, as it is clear in his later book, "Perspectival thought". | |
dc.language.iso | eus | |
dc.publisher | Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.title | Recanati: esaldiaren testuingurua eta edukiak | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.rights.holder | © 2008, Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko Argitalpen Zerbitzua | |