Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKorta Carrión, Kepa
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-06T16:33:43Z
dc.date.available2020-10-06T16:33:43Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationGogoa 8(1) : 87-94 (2008)
dc.identifier.issn1577-9424
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/46508
dc.description.abstractIn "Literal meaning", Franfois Recanati argues for contextualism on utterance meaning and content, against literalism, indexicalism and syncretic views. A widely held assumption among participants in the debate is the thesis I call 'monopropositionalism,' that is, the view that the utterance of a non-ambiguous sentence is associated with one and only one proposition (implicatures apart).The only position apparently incompatible with monopropositionalism seems to be the syncretic view, a view that Recanati rejects. However, he doesn't embrace monopropositionalism, as it is clear in his later book, "Perspectival thought".
dc.language.isoeus
dc.publisherServicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleRecanati: esaldiaren testuingurua eta edukiak
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.holder© 2008, Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko Argitalpen Zerbitzua


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record