Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUlazia Manterola, Alain
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-06T16:46:17Z
dc.date.available2020-10-06T16:46:17Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationGogoa 9(2) : 249-259 (2009)
dc.identifier.issn1577-9424
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/46531
dc.description.abstractSaunders Mac Lane asked why mathematics has got the branches it has. The foundations of set theory do not explain properly the most important features of mathematical structure. We should not search on forms but on human activities and culture in order to explain that structure and its branches. In this way we can also answer why mathematics works so suitably in the understanding of reality: because it comes from the human activity in reality. Developing this view Lakoff and Nuñez have proposed a finer cognitive perspective of the issue, where mathematical reasoning is based in perceptual@motor and image schemas of the embodied mind. Thus Platonist philosophy of mathematics and its '"dangerous consequences'" are strongly attacked. 1 will finish this critical notice commenting some weaknesses of the view and the role diagrams play in connection with Embodied Mathematics.
dc.language.isoeus
dc.publisherServicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleMatematikaren ikuspegi kategorialetik Gorpuztutako Matematikaren ikuspegira
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.holder© 2009, Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko Argitalpen Zerbitzua


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record