Ohar bat intentzionalitatearen trataezintasunaren inguruan

Abstract

Hilary Putnamek egindako proposamen konkretu batzuek intentzionalitateari buruzko gogoeta filosofikoan eragin izugarria izan badute ere, ez du inon ematen intentzionalitatearen auziari orokorrean helduko dion teoria osorik. Testu honen helburu nagusia da Putnamek intentzionalitatearen '"trataezintasunaren'" inguruan egiten duen diagnostikoa argitzea. Testuan azaltzen denez, Putnamen iritziz, marko naturalista partikular baten barnean intentzionalitatea trataezin izatera iritsi da, baina intentzionalitatearen izaera trataezin hori ez da intentzionalitatearen eta naturalismoaren artean berez legokeen halako tentsio batengatik, baizik eta gaurko jarrera naturalista gehienek jaso eta onartzen duten hamazazpigarren mendeko intentzionalismo kartesiar batengatik.; Even though some of Putnam’s particular proposals have had a huge impact on the philosophical discussion regarding the nature of intentionality, he does not offer anywhere a general theory that would offer a general account of the nature of intentionality. The main goal of the present paper is to explain Putnam’s own diagnostics on the alleged '"intractability'" of intentionality. As it is explained in the article, according to Putnam, within a particular naturalistic framework intentionality has become intractable, but such intractability is not due to some tension between intentionality and naturalism themselves, but due to a cartesian intentionalism developed in the seventeenth century inherited and assumed by most of the naturalistic accounts nowadays.