Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAguirre Santos, Javier
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-08T17:01:47Z
dc.date.available2020-10-08T17:01:47Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationGogoa (19) : 17-33 (2019)
dc.identifier.issn1577-9424
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/46631
dc.description.abstractThroughout the central books of Metaphysics, Aristotle investigates the four senses of the term being: accidentally, in itself, as true and false, as potency and act. After arguing that the first sense of being is to be substance, Aristotle argues that the substance, in the strict sense, should be understood as a form, not as a matter or compound.; Metafisikaren erdiko liburuetan zehar, Aristotelesek izan terminoaren lau zentzuak –alegia, akzidentalki, berez, egiazko eta faltsu gisa, eta potentzian eta egintzan– ikertzen ditu. Izatearen zentzu horien artean zentzu lehena substantziari dagokiola argudiatu ondoren, Aristotelesek argudiatzen du substantzia, zentzu estuan, forma gisa ulertu behar dela, eta ez materia edo konposatu gisa.
dc.language.isoeus
dc.publisherServicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleAristotelesen substantzia materia, konposatu eta forma gisa
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.holder© 2019 UPV/EHU Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.identifier.doi10.1387/gogoa.20989


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2019 UPV/EHU Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2019 UPV/EHU Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional