Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorIrigoyen Garbizu, Itziares
dc.contributor.advisorSierra Araujo, Basilioes
dc.contributor.authorImatz Ojanguren, Eukene
dc.contributor.otherCiencia de la Computación e Inteligencia Artificial/Konputazio Zientzia eta Adimen Artifiziala
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-27T11:01:40Z
dc.date.available2013-06-27T11:01:40Z
dc.date.issued2013-06-27T11:01:40Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/10354
dc.description.abstractFunctional Electrical Stimulation (FES) is a technique that consists on applying electrical current pulses to artificially activate motor nerve fibers and produce muscle contractions to achieve functional movements. The main applications of FES are within the rehabilitation field, in which this technique is used to aid recovery or to restore lost motor functions. People that benefit of FES are usually patients with neurological disorders which result in motor dysfunctions; most common patients include stroke and spinal cord injury (SCI). Neuroprosthesis are devices that have their basis in FES technique, and their aim is to bridge interrupted or damaged neural paths between the brain and upper or lower limbs. One of the aims of neuroprosthesis is to artificially generate muscle contractions that produce functional movements, and therefore, assist impaired people by making them able to perform activities of daily living (ADL). FES applies current pulses and stimulates nerve fibers by means of electrodes, which can be either implanted or surface electrodes. Both of them have advantages and disadvantages. Implanted electrodes need open surgery to place them next to the nerve root, so these electrodes carry many disadvantages that are produced by the use of invasive techniques. In return, as the electrodes are attached to the nerve, they make it easier to achieve selective functional movements. On the contrary, surface electrodes are not invasive and are easily attached or detached on the skin. Main disadvantages of surface electrodes are the difficulty of selectively stimulating nerve fibers and uncomfortable feeling perceived by users due to sensory nerves located in the skin. Electrical stimulation surface electrode technology has improved significantly through the years and recently, multi-field electrodes have been suggested. This multi-field or matrix electrode approach brings many advantages to FES; among them it is the possibility of easily applying different stimulation methods and techniques. The main goal of this thesis is therefore, to test two stimulation methods, which are asynchronous and synchronous stimulation, in the upper limb with multi-field electrodes. To this end, a purpose-built wrist torque measuring system and a graphic user interface were developed to measure wrist torque produced with each of the methods and to efficiently carry out the experiments. Then, both methods were tested on 15 healthy subjects and sensitivity results were analyzed for different cases. Results show that there are significant differences between methods regarding sensation in some cases, which can affect effectiveness or success of FES.es
dc.description.sponsorshipTecnalia and Fundación Iñaki Goenagaes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.relation.ispartofseries2013;1
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/*
dc.subjectfunctional electrical stimulationes
dc.subjectmulti-field electrodeses
dc.subjectasynchronous stimulationes
dc.subjectsynchronous stimulationes
dc.subjectdiscomfortes
dc.titleStimulation discomfort comparison of asynchronous and synchronous methods with multi-field electrodeses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesises
dc.rights.holderAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported*


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported