Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVromen, Jack J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-29T14:35:13Z
dc.date.available2020-01-29T14:35:13Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citationTheoria 18(3) : 297-323 (2003)
dc.identifier.issn2171-679X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/39252
dc.description.abstractIn several recent papers Arthur Robson sketches evolutionary scenarios in order to explain why we humans evolved hard-wired utility functions and the capacity to choose flexibly on the basis of them. These scenarios are scrutinized minutely in the paper. It is pointed out that Robson ignores several relevant insightful ideas and distinctions that have surfaced in other contemporary evolutionary theorizing. A somewhat different picture of human behavior emerges once these ideas and distinctions are taken seriously.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherServicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleWhy the economic conception of human behabiour might lack a biological basis
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.holder© 2003, Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko Argitalpen Zerbitzua


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record