dc.contributor.author | Vromen, Jack J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-29T14:35:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-29T14:35:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Theoria 18(3) : 297-323 (2003) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2171-679X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/39252 | |
dc.description.abstract | In several recent papers Arthur Robson sketches evolutionary scenarios in order to explain why we humans evolved hard-wired utility functions and the capacity to choose flexibly on the basis of them. These scenarios are scrutinized minutely in the paper. It is pointed out that Robson ignores several relevant insightful ideas and distinctions that have surfaced in other contemporary evolutionary theorizing. A somewhat different picture of human behavior emerges once these ideas and distinctions are taken seriously. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.title | Why the economic conception of human behabiour might lack a biological basis | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.rights.holder | © 2003, Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko Argitalpen Zerbitzua | |