dc.contributor.author | Harp, Randall | |
dc.contributor.author | Khalifa, Kareem | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-29T19:20:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-29T19:20:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Theoria 30(3) : 431-447 (2015) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2171-679X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/39600 | |
dc.description.abstract | Many have argued that unified theories ought to be pursued wherever possible. We deny this on the basis of social-epistemological and game-theoretic considerations. Consequently, those seeking a more ubiquitous role for unification must either attend to the scientific community’s social structure in greater detail than has been the case, and/or radically revise their conception of unification. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.title | Why pursue unification?: a social-epistemological puzzle | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.rights.holder | © 2015, Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko Argitalpen Zerbitzua | |