dc.contributor.author | Sturm, Thomas | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-30T19:06:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-30T19:06:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Theoria 34(3) : 321-341 (2019) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2171-679X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/39735 | |
dc.description.abstract | I offer an analysis of the concept of scientific innovation. When research is innovated, highly noveland usefulelements of investigation begin to spread through a scientific community, resulting from a process which is neither due to blind chance nor to necessity, but to a minimal use of rationality. This, however, leads to tension between two claims: (1) scientific innovation can be explained rationally; (2) no existing account of rationality explains scientific innovation. There are good reasons to maintain (1) and (2), but it is difficult for both claims to be accepted simultaneously by a rational subject.In particular, I argue that neither standard nor bounded theories of rationality can deliver a satisfactory explanation of scientific innovations. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.title | Scientific innovation: A conceptual explication and a dilemma | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.rights.holder | © 2019 UPV/EHU Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1387/theoria.20652 | |