Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Mateos, D.
dc.contributor.authorBarbier, E.B.
dc.contributor.authorJones, P.C.
dc.contributor.authorJones, H.P.
dc.contributor.authorAronson, J.
dc.contributor.authorLópez-López, J.A.
dc.contributor.authorMcCrackin, M.L.
dc.contributor.authorMeli, P.
dc.contributor.authorMontoya, D.
dc.contributor.authorRey, Benayas, J.M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-18T11:03:18Z
dc.date.available2020-06-18T11:03:18Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationNature Communications 8 : 14163 (2017)
dc.identifier.issn2041-1723
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/44035
dc.description.abstractEcosystem recovery from anthropogenic disturbances, either without human intervention or assisted by ecological restoration, is increasingly occurring worldwide. As ecosystems progress through recovery, it is important to estimate any resulting deficit in biodiversity and functions. Here we use data from 3,035 sampling plots worldwide, to quantify the interim reduction of biodiversity and functions occurring during the recovery process (that is, the 'recovery debt'). Compared with reference levels, recovering ecosystems run annual deficits of 46-51% for organism abundance, 27-33% for species diversity, 32-42% for carbon cycling and 31-41% for nitrogen cycling. Our results are consistent across biomes but not across degrading factors. Our results suggest that recovering and restored ecosystems have less abundance, diversity and cycling of carbon and nitrogen than 'undisturbed' ecosystems, and that even if complete recovery is reached, an interim recovery debt will accumulate. Under such circumstances, increasing the quantity of less-functional ecosystems through ecological restoration and offsetting are inadequate alternatives to ecosystem protection. (c) 2017 The Author(s).
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding received from the National Science Foundation DBI-1052875, by the German Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Leipzig (Research Program ‘Terrestrial Environments’) and by sDiv, the Synthesis Centre of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig (German Research Foundation DFG FZT 118).
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNature
dc.relation.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14163
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/
dc.titleAnthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.holder(c) 2017 The Authors.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the cre
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/ncomms14163


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

(c) 2017 The Authors.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the cre
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as (c) 2017 The Authors.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the cre