Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcCrackin, M.L.
dc.contributor.authorJones, H.P.
dc.contributor.authorJones, P.C.
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Mateos, D.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-18T11:03:19Z
dc.date.available2020-06-18T11:03:19Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationLimnology And Oceanography 62(2) : 507-518 (2017)
dc.identifier.issn0024-3590
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/44037
dc.description.abstractIn order to inform policies aimed at reducing nutrient emissions to surface waters, it is essential to understand how aquatic ecosystems respond to eutrophication management. Using data from 89 studies worldwide, we examined responses to the reduction or cessation of anthropogenic nutrient inputs relative to baseline conditions. Baseline conditions were pre-disturbance conditions, undisturbed reference sites, restoration targets, or experimental controls. We estimated recovery completeness (% baseline conditions reached) and recovery rate (annual % change relative to baseline conditions) for plant and animal abundance and diversity and for ecosystem functions. Categories were considered fully recovered if the 95% confidence interval (CI) of recovery completeness overlapped 100% and partially recovered if the CI did not overlap either 100% or zero. Cessation of nutrient inputs did not result in more complete or faster recovery than partial nutrient reductions, due likely to insufficient passage of time, nutrients from other sources, or shifting baselines. Together, lakes and coastal marine areas achieved 34% (±16% CI) and 24% (±15% CI) of baseline conditions decades after the cessation or partial reduction of nutrients, respectively. One third of individual response variables showed no change or worsened conditions, suggesting that achieving baseline conditions may not be possible in all cases. Implied recovery times after cessation of nutrient inputs varied widely, from up 1 yr to nearly a century, depending on response. Our results suggest that long-term monitoring is needed to better understand recovery timescales and trajectories and that policy measures must consider the potential for slow and partial recovery. (c) 2016 The Authors Limnology and Oceanography published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding received from the National Science Foundation DBI-1052875, by the German Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig (Research Program ‘Terrestrial Environments’), and by sDiv, the Synthesis Centre of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig (German Research Foundation DFG FZT 118). Funding for MLM was provided by Baltic Eye, the Baltic Sea 2020 Foundation, and the National Academies of Science Research Associateship Programe.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lno.10441
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/
dc.titleRecovery of lakes and coastal marine ecosystems from eutrophication: A global meta-analysis
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.holder(c) 2016 The Authors Limnology and Oceanography published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/lno.10441


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

(c) 2016 The Authors Limnology and Oceanography published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as (c) 2016 The Authors Limnology and Oceanography published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography