Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZafra-Calvo, N.
dc.contributor.authorBalvanera, P
dc.contributor.authorPascual, U.
dc.contributor.authorMerçon, J.
dc.contributor.authorMartín-López, B
dc.contributor.authorvan Noordwijk, M.
dc.contributor.authorMwampamba, T.H.
dc.contributor.authorIfejika Speranza, C.
dc.contributor.authorArias-Arévalo, P
dc.contributor.authorCabrol, D.
dc.contributor.authorCáceres, D.M.
dc.contributor.authorO'Farrell, P.
dc.contributor.authorSubramanian, S.M
dc.contributor.authorDevy, S.
dc.contributor.authorKrishnan, S.
dc.contributor.authorCarmenta, R.
dc.contributor.authorGuibrunet, L.
dc.contributor.authorKraus-Elsin, Y
dc.contributor.authorMoersberger, H.
dc.contributor.authorCariño, J.
dc.contributor.authorDíaz, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-29T09:09:40Z
dc.date.available2020-10-29T09:09:40Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationGLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS: 63: 102115 (2020)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0959-3780
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/47386
dc.description.abstractPlural valuation is about eliciting the diverse values of nature articulated by different stakeholders in order to inform decision making and thus achieve more equitable and sustainable outcomes. We explore what approaches align with plural valuation on the ground, as well as how different social-ecological contexts play a role in translating plural valuation into decisions and outcomes. Based on a co-constructed analytical approach relying on empirical information from ten cases from the Global South, we find that plural valuation contributes to equitable and sustainable outcomes if the valuation process: 1) is based on participatory value elicitation approaches; 2) is framed with a clear action-oriented purpose; 3) provides space for marginalized stakeholders to articulate their values in ways that can be included in decisions; 4) is used as a tool to identify and help reconcile different cognitive models about human-nature relations; and 5) fosters open communication and collaboration among stakeholders. We also find that power asymmetries can hinder plural valuation. As interest and support for undertaking plural valuation grows, a deeper understanding is needed regarding how it can be adapted to different purposes, approaches, and social-ecological contexts in order to contribute to social equity and sustainability. © 2020 Elsevier Ltdes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the PEGASuS program of Future Earth funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation through subgrant GBMF5433 to the Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3) to support the EQUIVAL project and the work of UP, PB and NZ-C. The authors wish to thank the Sida funded Swedbio programme at the Stockholm Resilience Centre, the Programme for Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS) of Future Earth and the Future Earth Montreal Global Hub , the Institute of Ecosystem and Sustainability Research at the Autonomous National University of Mexico , and the Division of Science Policy and Capacity-Building (SC/PCB) of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) , the Red Socioecos CONACYT 2017- 260483, CISEN V, The ValuES project from GIZ supported by the BMUB and ecoSERVICES from Future Earth, and the Frank Jackson Foundation for providing support and financial resources. PB enjoyed sabbatical leave during the final iterations of this manuscript and UP enjoyed a research stay at the University of Life Sciences (Norway) at the beginning of the research project, funded by the Basque Government through an “Ikermugikortasuna” grant. Laslty, UP and NZ-C acknowledge support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, under BC3 ‘Unit of excellence’ (MIMECO, MDM-2017- 0714).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/MDM-2017-0714es_ES
dc.relationEUS/BERC/BERC.2018-2021es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectcognitiones_ES
dc.subjectcommunicationes_ES
dc.subjectdecision makinges_ES
dc.subjectecological approaches_ES
dc.subjectenvironmental issuees_ES
dc.subjectequityes_ES
dc.subjectnature-society relations;es_ES
dc.subjectstakeholderes_ES
dc.subjectsustainabilityes_ES
dc.titlePlural valuation of nature for equity and sustainability: Insights from the Global Southes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2020 Elsevier Ltdes_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102115es_ES
dc.contributor.funderInstitute of Ecosystem and Sustainability Research, Frank Jackson Foundation, Basque Government, Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, UNESCO, University of Life Sciences, Autonomous National University of Mexico, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, BMUB, Stockholm Resilience Centre, Sida, Red Socioecos CONACYT, Division of Science Policy and Capacity-Building


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020 Elsevier Ltd