Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNikas, A.
dc.contributor.authorLieu, J.
dc.contributor.authorSorman, A.
dc.contributor.authorGambhir, A.
dc.contributor.authorTurhan, E.
dc.contributor.authorBaptista, B.V.
dc.contributor.authorDoukas, H.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-14T15:52:20Z
dc.date.available2023-02-14T15:52:20Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Research and Social Science: 70: 101780 (2020)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn22146296
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/59830
dc.description.abstractQuantitative systems modelling in support of climate policy has tended to focus more on the supply side in assessing interactions among technology, economy, environment, policy and society. By contrast, the demand side is usually underrepresented, often emphasising technological options for energy efficiency improvements. In this perspective, we argue that scientific support to climate action is not only about exploring capacity of what , in terms of policy and outcome, but also about assessing feasibility and desirability, in terms of when , where and especially for whom . Without the necessary behavioural and societal transformations, the world faces an inadequate response to the climate crisis challenge. This could result from poor uptake of low-carbon technologies, continued high-carbon intensive lifestyles, or economy-wide rebound effects. For this reason, we propose a framing for a holistic and transdisciplinary perspective on the role of human choices and behaviours in influencing the low-carbon transition, starting from the desires of individuals and communities, and analysing how these interact with the energy and economic landscape, leading to systemic change at the macro-level. In making a case for a political ecology agenda, we expand our scope, from comprehending the role of societal acceptance and uptake of end-use technologies, to co-developing knowledge with citizens from non-mainstream and marginalised communities, and to defining the modelling requirements to assess the decarbonisation potential of shifting lifestyle patterns in climate change and action. © 2020 The Author(s)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the H2020 European Commission Projects “PARIS REINFORCE” under Grant Agreement No. 820846, and “SHAPE_ID” under Grant Agreement No. 822705. The sole responsibility for the content of this paper lies with the authors; the paper does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Commission .es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherEnergy Research and Social Sciencees_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/820846es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/822705es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectBehavioral changees_ES
dc.subjectClimate policyes_ES
dc.subjectDeliberative democracyes_ES
dc.subjectIntegrated assessment modelinges_ES
dc.subjectLifestylees_ES
dc.subjectTransdisciplinary researches_ES
dc.titleThe desirability of transitions in demand: Incorporating behavioural and societal transformations into energy modellinges_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otheres_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2020 The Author(s)es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101780es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.erss.2020.101780
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 The Author(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020 The Author(s)