Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrugnach, M.
dc.contributor.authorHoek, R.v.d.
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-31T14:13:27Z
dc.date.available2023-05-31T14:13:27Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationMarine Policy: 152: 105626 (2023)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/61260
dc.description.abstractNature Based Solutions (NbS) are mainstreamed as an innovative and adequate approach to climate change. Combining natural dynamics and materials with technical knowledge, NbS are seen as a promising venue for coastal adaptation. However, little still is known about the role that the many uncertainties associated with such projects play in the effectiveness of these solutions, and about how to cope with these uncertainties, considering both positive and negative impacts that NbS may have for our society. Here, we investigate, if and how, managing uncertainties via the cascades of interrelated uncertainties conceptual framework improves the governance capacity for implementing NbS coastal management projects. To this end, we conduct an ex-post analysis of the uncertainties in two NbS study cases (Sand Engine and Safety Buffer Oyster Dam BwN projects in The Netherlands), critically analyzing through the conceptual framework, how uncertainties were addressed and proposing better fit supporting alternatives. Our results indicate major benefits for uncertainty management, supporting project development and implementation: generating more flexibility in managing under unknown conditions, being able to anticipate conflict and maladaptations, providing opportunities of creating new supporting relationships and alternative solutions. © 2023es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank the foundation EcoShape – responsible for the execution of the Dutch national research programme ‘Building with Nature’ – for initially funding this research, and to Theo Vulink for their participation in the interviews. We also would like to express our gratitude to Prof. A.Y. Hoekstra, for his input and support in earlier stages of this research. Brugnach´s contribution was partially supported by Maria de Maeztu excellence accreditation 2023‐2026 (Ref. CEX2021‐001201‐M ), funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 .es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMarine Policyes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MCIN/CEX2021‐001201es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectAmbiguityes_ES
dc.subjectBuilding with naturees_ES
dc.subjectClimate change adaptationes_ES
dc.subjectCoastal managementes_ES
dc.subjectMaladaptationes_ES
dc.subjectNature based solutionses_ES
dc.subjectUncertaintyes_ES
dc.subjectUncertainty cascadeses_ES
dc.titleEmbracing ambiguity in climate change adaptation for more effective responses to new uncertain shorescapes conditionses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The Authors.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105626es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105626


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Authors.