Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDiaz, S
dc.contributor.authorZafra-Calvo, N.
dc.contributor.authorPurvis, A.
dc.contributor.authorVerburg, P. H.
dc.contributor.authorObura, D.
dc.contributor.authorLeadley, P.
dc.contributor.authorChaplin-Kramer, R.
dc.contributor.authorDe Meester, L.
dc.contributor.authorDulloo, E.
dc.contributor.authorMartín-López, B.
dc.contributor.authorShaw, M. R.
dc.contributor.authorVisconti, P.
dc.contributor.authorBroadgate, W.
dc.contributor.authorBruford, M. W.
dc.contributor.authorBurgess, N. D.
dc.contributor.authorCavender- Bares, J.
dc.contributor.authorDeClerck, F.
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Palacio, J. M.
dc.contributor.authorGaribaldi, L. A.
dc.contributor.authorHill, S. L. L.
dc.contributor.authorIsbell, F.
dc.contributor.authorKhoury, C. K.
dc.contributor.authorKrug, C. B
dc.contributor.authorLiu, J.
dc.contributor.authorMaron, M.
dc.contributor.authorMcGowan, P. J. K.
dc.contributor.authorPereira, H. M.
dc.contributor.authorReyes-García, V.
dc.contributor.authorRocha, J.
dc.contributor.authorRondinini, C.
dc.contributor.authorShannon, L.
dc.contributor.authorSnelgrove, P. V. R.
dc.contributor.authorShin, Y. J.
dc.contributor.authorSpeh, E. M.
dc.contributor.authorStrassburg, B.
dc.contributor.authorSubramanian, S. M.
dc.contributor.authorTewksbury, J. J.
dc.contributor.authorWatson, J. E. M.
dc.contributor.authorZanne, A. E.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T12:51:23Z
dc.date.available2023-06-16T12:51:23Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-23
dc.identifier.citationSCIENCE: 370 (6515): 411-413 (2020)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/61447
dc.description.abstractGlobal biodiversity policy is at a crossroads. Recent global assessments of living nature (1, 2) and climate (3) show worsening trends and a rapidly narrowing window for action. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has recently announced that none of the 20 Aichi targets for biodiversity it set in 2010 has been reached and only six have been partially achieved (4). Against this backdrop, nations are now negotiating the next generation of the CBD's global goals [see supplementary materials (SM)], due for adoption in 2021, which will frame actions of governments and other actors for decades to come. In response to the goals proposed in the draft post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) made public by the CBD (5), we urge negotiators to consider three points that are critical if the agreed goals are to stabilize or reverse nature's decline. First, multiple goals are required because of nature's complexity, with different facets—genes, populations, species, deep evolutionary history, ecosystems, and their contributions to people—having markedly different geographic distributions and responses to human drivers. Second, interlinkages among these facets mean that goals must be defined and developed holistically rather than in isolation, with potential to advance multiple goals simultaneously and minimize trade-offs between them. Third, only the highest level of ambition in setting each goal, and implementing all goals in an integrated manner, will give a realistic chance of stopping—and beginning to reverse—biodiversity loss by 2050.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article was initiate data meeting of 63 scientists from 26 countries organized by the Earth Commission in close collaboration with the CBD and Future Earth. Financial support for the meeting, which took place on 28 February to 2 March 2020, was provided by Oak Foundation and Porticus. S. Dobrota, H. Moersberger, and the whole of the Earth Commission Secretariat provided support in the meeting organization. We thank the following contributors to the Report to the CBD Synthesizing the Scientific Evidence to Inform the Developmen to fthe Post-2020 Global Framework on Biodiversity, on which this article builds :J. Bascompte, J. Cari?o, N. Casta?eda-Alvarez, M.Azeredode Dornelas, S. Hoban, S. Jones, P. Jordano, L. Laikre, N. Maxted, P. Miloslavich, D. Moreno-Mateos, R. Ogden, G. Segelbacher, J.-C. Svenning. We also thank members of the Future Earth GRPE volvES (formerly bioGENESIS): M.B ellon, L. Colli ,F. Forest, M. Johnson, R. Kassen, C. Souffreau, and E. V?zquez Dom?nguez. We thank D. Cooper for useful discussions and for advice in the design of the meeting. We thank Georg in a M. Macefor discussions about this paper and countless others and for her wonderful and generous leadership, insight, support, and example overmany years; we wil lmiss her greatly.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSCIENCEes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectassessment methodes_ES
dc.subjectbiodiversityes_ES
dc.subjectscience and technologyes_ES
dc.subjectsustainabilityes_ES
dc.subjectconservation biologyes_ES
dc.subjectcontrolled studyes_ES
dc.subjectenvironmental monitoring;es_ES
dc.subjectenvironmental policyes_ES
dc.subjectenvironmental sustainabilityes_ES
dc.subjectenetic variabilityes_ES
dc.subjectpriority journales_ES
dc.subjectquality of lifees_ES
dc.subjectspecies identificationes_ES
dc.subjectbiodiversityes_ES
dc.subjectecosystemes_ES
dc.subjecthumanes_ES
dc.subjectmotivationes_ES
dc.subjectnatural sciencees_ES
dc.subjectnonhumanes_ES
dc.subjectspecies extinctiones_ES
dc.subjectenvironmental protectiones_ES
dc.subjectpublic policyes_ES
dc.subjectBiodiversityes_ES
dc.subjectConservation of Natural Resourceses_ES
dc.subjectPublic Policyes_ES
dc.titleSet ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainabilityes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© Elsevier B.Ves_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abe1530es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1126/science.abe1530


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Elsevier B.V
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © Elsevier B.V