Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhite, T.B.
dc.contributor.authorPetrovan, S.O.
dc.contributor.authorBooth, H.
dc.contributor.authorCorrea, R.J.
dc.contributor.authorGatt, Y.
dc.contributor.authorMartin, P.A.
dc.contributor.authorNewell, H.
dc.contributor.authorWorthington, T.A.
dc.contributor.authorSutherland, W.J.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-23T09:26:25Z
dc.date.available2023-06-23T09:26:25Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationConservation Science and Practice: 4 (12) (2022)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/61593
dc.description.abstractThe need for conservation action to be cost-effective is widely accepted, resulting in increased interest and effort to assess effectiveness. Assessing the financial and economic costs of conservation is equally important for assessing cost-effectiveness, yet their measurement and assessment are repeatedly identified as lacking. The healthcare sector, in contrast, has made substantial progress in identifying and including costs in decision-making. Here, we consider what conservation can learn from this experience. We present a three-step framework for identifying and recording the relevant economic costs and benefits of conservation interventions where the user (1) describes the costing context, (2) determines which types of cost and benefit to include, and (3) obtains values for these costs and benefits alongside metadata necessary for others to interpret the data. This framework is designed to help estimate economic costs but can also be used flexibly to record the direct costs of interventions (i.e., financial costs) and calculate financial and economic benefits. Although recording data on economic costs and benefits is deceptively complex, this framework facilitates improved recording, and indicates how collating this data could enhance the assessment of cost-effectiveness across conservation contexts using a range of decision-making tools. © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservationes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank Alec Christie, Ashley Simkins, and Anthony Waldron for helpful discussions and Arcadia, MAVA, and the David and Claudia Harding Foundation for funding. We thank two anonymous reviewers, and Gwen Iacona for detailed comments that helped improve the manuscript. The work was completed by Thomas White as part of a PhD supported by a Balfour studentship at the Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherConservation Science and Practicees_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectbiodiversity conservation costses_ES
dc.subjectcost-effectiveness analysises_ES
dc.subjectdecision makinges_ES
dc.subjectevidence-based conservationes_ES
dc.subjectfinancial costses_ES
dc.subjectreturn-on-investmentes_ES
dc.titleDetermining the economic costs and benefits of conservation actions: A decision support frameworkes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authors. Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12840es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/csp2.12840


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Authors. Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.