Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDawson, N.M.
dc.contributor.authorCoolsaet, B.
dc.contributor.authorBhardwaj, A.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, D.
dc.contributor.authorLliso, B.
dc.contributor.authorLoos, J.
dc.contributor.authorMannocci, L.
dc.contributor.authorMartin, A.
dc.contributor.authorOliva, M.
dc.contributor.authorPascual, U.
dc.contributor.authorSherpa, P.
dc.contributor.authorWorsdell, T.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-13T07:30:59Z
dc.date.available2024-08-13T07:30:59Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.identifier.citationAmbio (2024)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/69249
dc.description.abstractDrawing on 662 studies from 102 countries, we present a systematic review of published empirical studies about site-level biodiversity conservation initiated between 1970 and 2019. Within this sample, we find that knowledge production about the Global South is largely produced by researchers in the Global North, implying a neocolonial power dynamic. We also find evidence of bias in reported ecological outcomes linked to lack of independence in scientific studies, serving to uphold narratives about who should lead conservation. We explore relationships in the sample studies between conservation initiative types, the extent of Indigenous Peoples’ and local communities’ influence in governance, and reported social and ecological outcomes. Findings reveal positive ecological and social outcomes are strongly associated with higher levels of influence of Indigenous Peoples and local communities and their institutions, implying equity in conservation practice should be advanced not only for moral reasons, but because it can enhance conservation effectiveness. © The Author(s) 2024.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the Centre for the Synthesis and Analysis of Biodiversity (CESAB) of the French Foundation for Research on Biodiversity (FRB) under the Just Conservation project. Additional support was provided by Lille Catholic University under the AMBROISE funding call. JL acknowledges funding by the Robert-Bosch foundation for the project \u201CWildlife, Values, Justice\u201D. UP acknowledges BC3\u2019s Maria de Maeztu excellence accreditation 2023-2026 (Ref. CEX2021-001201- M) provided by MCIN/AEI/ https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033 . The authors are grateful to Dan Brockington and an anonymous reviewer for their thorough and thoughtful reviews.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAmbioes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICIU/CEX2021-001201-Mes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectConservation effectivenesses_ES
dc.subjectConservation sciencees_ES
dc.subjectEquitable governancees_ES
dc.subjectIndigenous Peoples and local communitieses_ES
dc.subjectParticipationes_ES
dc.subjectRights-based conservationes_ES
dc.titleReviewing the science on 50 years of conservation: Knowledge production biases and lessons for practicees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2024es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02049-wes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13280-024-02049-w


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2024
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2024