Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSabot, M.E.B
dc.contributor.authorDe Kauwe, M.G.
dc.contributor.authorPitman, A.J.
dc.contributor.authorEllsworth, D.S.
dc.contributor.authorMedlyn, B.E.
dc.contributor.authorCaldararu, S.
dc.contributor.authorZaehle, S.
dc.contributor.authorCrous, K.Y.
dc.contributor.authorGimeno, T.E.
dc.contributor.authorWujeska-Klause, A.
dc.contributor.authorMu, M.
dc.contributor.authorYang, J.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-20T07:06:09Z
dc.date.available2024-08-20T07:06:09Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-01
dc.identifier.citationPlant Cell and Environment: 45 (9): 2744-2761 (2022)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/69309
dc.description.abstractThere is a pressing need to better understand ecosystem resilience to droughts and heatwaves. Eco-evolutionary optimization approaches have been proposed as means to build this understanding in land surface models and improve their predictive capability, but competing approaches are yet to be tested together. Here, we coupled approaches that optimize canopy gas exchange and leaf nitrogen investment, respectively, extending both approaches to account for hydraulic impairment. We assessed model predictions using observations from a native Eucalyptus woodland that experienced repeated droughts and heatwaves between 2013 and 2020, whilst exposed to an elevated [CO2] treatment. Our combined approaches improved predictions of transpiration and enhanced the simulated magnitude of the CO2 fertilization effect on gross primary productivity. The competing approaches also worked consistently along axes of change in soil moisture, leaf area, and [CO2]. Despite predictions of a significant percentage loss of hydraulic conductivity due to embolism (PLC) in 2013, 2014, 2016, and 2017 (99th percentile PLC > 45%), simulated hydraulic legacy effects were small and short-lived (2 months). Our analysis suggests that leaf shedding and/or suppressed foliage growth formed a strategy to mitigate drought risk. Accounting for foliage responses to water availability has the potential to improve model predictions of ecosystem resilience. © 2022 The Authors. Plant, Cell & Environment published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipMEBS, MDK, and AJP acknowledge support from the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes (CE170100023). MEBS was also supported by the UNSW Scientia PhD Scholarship Scheme. MDK and AJP acknowledge support from the ARC Discovery Grant (DP190101823) and MDK also acknowledges Eucalypt Australia and the NSW Research Attraction and Acceleration Program, which separately supported the EucFACE infrastructure. EucFACE was built as an initiative of the Australian Government, as part of the Nation-building Economic Stimulus Package, and is supported by the Australian Commonwealth in collaboration with Western Sydney University. BEM acknowledges support from the ARC Laureate Fellowship FL190100003. Finally, we thank the Editor, Dr Danielle Way, and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. Open access publishing facilitated by University of New South Wales, as part of the Wiley - University of New South Wales agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians. All model, analysis code, and data files are freely available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6717290 (Sabot, 2022) and the code is also available from https://github.com/ManonSabot/Competing_Optimal_Adjustments. Previously published data sets used in this study can be accessed at: http://doi.org/10.4225/35/563159f223739 (Duursma et al., 2016). http://doi.org/10.4225/35/57ec5d4a2b78e (Ellsworth et al., 2017). http://doi.org/10.4225/35/55b6e313444ff (Gimeno et al., 2016). http://doi.org/10.4225/35/5ab9bd1e2f4fb (Gimeno et al., 2018). MEBS, MDK, and AJP acknowledge support from the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes (CE170100023). MEBS was also supported by the UNSW Scientia PhD Scholarship Scheme. MDK and AJP acknowledge support from the ARC Discovery Grant (DP190101823) and MDK also acknowledges Eucalypt Australia and the NSW Research Attraction and Acceleration Program, which separately supported the EucFACE infrastructure. EucFACE was built as an initiative of the Australian Government, as part of the Nation‐building Economic Stimulus Package, and is supported by the Australian Commonwealth in collaboration with Western Sydney University. BEM acknowledges support from the ARC Laureate Fellowship FL190100003. Finally, we thank the Editor, Dr Danielle Way, and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. Open access publishing facilitated by University of New South Wales, as part of the Wiley ‐ University of New South Wales agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherPlant Cell and Environmentes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectdroughtes_ES
dc.subjectelevated CO 2es_ES
dc.subjectgas exchangees_ES
dc.subjecthydraulic legacieses_ES
dc.subjectland surface modelses_ES
dc.subjectleaf area indexes_ES
dc.subjectnitrogenes_ES
dc.subjectoptimizationes_ES
dc.subjectplant optimalityes_ES
dc.subjectvegetation modelses_ES
dc.titlePredicting resilience through the lens of competing adjustments to vegetation functiones_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authors.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pce.14376es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/pce.14376


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Authors.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2022 The Authors.