Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDi Paolo, Ezequiel
dc.contributor.authorBarandiaran Fernández, Xabier Eugenio ORCID
dc.contributor.authorBeaton, Michael James Stuart
dc.contributor.authorBuhrmann, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T14:07:40Z
dc.date.available2015-12-02T14:07:40Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-30
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in human neuroscience 8 : (2014) // Article ID 551es
dc.identifier.issn1662-5161
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/16295
dc.description.abstractLearning to perceive is faced with a classical paradox: if understanding is required for perception, how can we learn to perceive something new, something we do not yet understand? According to the sensorimotor approach, perception involves mastery of regular sensorimotor co-variations that depend on the agent and the environment, also known as the "laws" of sensorimotor contingencies (SMCs). In this sense, perception involves enacting relevant sensorimotor skills in each situation. It is important for this proposal that such skills can be learned and refined with experience and yet up to this date, the sensorimotor approach has had no explicit theory of perceptual learning. The situation is made more complex if we acknowledge the open-ended nature of human learning. In this paper we propose Piaget's theory of equilibration as a potential candidate to fulfill this role. This theory highlights the importance of intrinsic sensorimotor norms, in terms of the closure of sensorimotor schemes. It also explains how the equilibration of a sensorimotor organization faced with novelty or breakdowns proceeds by re-shaping pre-existing structures in coupling with dynamical regularities of the world. This way learning to perceive is guided by the equilibration of emerging forms of skillful coping with the world. We demonstrate the compatibility between Piaget's theory and the sensorimotor approach by providing a dynamical formalization of equilibration to give an explicit micro-genetic account of sensorimotor learning and, by extension, of how we learn to perceive. This allows us to draw important lessons in the form of general principles for open-ended sensorimotor learning, including the need for an intrinsic normative evaluation by the agent itself. We also explore implications of our micro-genetic account at the personal level.es
dc.description.sponsorshipThanks to Leonardo Bich, Marieke Rohde, and John Stewart useful comments on earlier versions of this article, This work is funded by the eSMCs: Extending Sensorimotor Contingencies to Cognition project, FP7-ICT-2009-6 no: 270212. Thanks also to IAS-Research group funding IT590-13 from the Basque Government.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundationes
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.subjectsensorimotor contingencieses
dc.subjectPiaget's theory of equilibrationes
dc.subjectdynamical systemses
dc.subjectopen-ended learninges
dc.subjectself-organizationes
dc.subjectplasticityes
dc.subjectvisiones
dc.subjectspacees
dc.subjectconsciousnesses
dc.subjectcontingencyes
dc.subjectexperiencees
dc.subjectcognitiones
dc.subjectroboticses
dc.subjectbehaviores
dc.titleLearning to perceive in the sensor motor approach: Piaget's theory of equilibration interpreted dynamicallyes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2014 Di Paolo, Barandiaran, Beaton and Buhrmann. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00551/abstractes
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fnhum.2014.00551
dc.departamentoesLógica y filosofía de la cienciaes_ES
dc.departamentoesFilosofíaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuLogika eta zientziaren filosofiaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuFilosofiaes_ES
dc.subject.categoriaBEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE
dc.subject.categoriaPSYCHIATRY AND MENTAL HEALTH
dc.subject.categoriaNEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
dc.subject.categoriaNEUROLOGY
dc.subject.categoriaBIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record