Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSamuel, Arthur G.
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-23T17:25:05Z
dc.date.available2017-02-23T17:25:05Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationArthur G. Samuel, Lexical representations are malleable for about one second: Evidence for the non-automaticity of perceptual recalibration, Cognitive Psychology, Volume 88, August 2016, Pages 88-114, ISSN 0010-0285, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.007.es
dc.identifier.issn0010-0285
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/20795
dc.descriptionAvailable online 16 July 2016es
dc.description.abstractIn listening to speech, people have been shown to apply several types of adjustment to their phonemic categories that take into account variations in the prevailing linguistic environment. These adjustments include selective adaptation, lexically driven recalibration, and audiovisually determined recalibration. Prior studies have used dual task procedures to test whether these adjustments are automatic or if they require attention, and all of these tests have supported automaticity. The current study instead uses a method of targeted distraction to demonstrate that lexical recalibration does in fact require attention. Building on this finding, the targeted distraction method is used to measure the period of time during which the lexical percept remains malleable. The results support a processing window of approximately one second, consistent with the results of a small number of prior studies that bear on this question. The results also demonstrate that recalibration is closely linked to the completion of lexical access.es
dc.description.sponsorshipSupport was provided by Ministerio de Ciencia E Innovacion Grant #PSI2014-53277 and by Ayuda Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa SEV-2015-0490. I thank Mark Pitt for providing the uniqueness point calculations, and Martin Cooke for calculating the glimpse analyses.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherCognitive Psychologyes
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/PSI2014-53277
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/SEV2015-0490
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.subjectPerceptual recalibrationes
dc.subjectAttention in recalibrationes
dc.subjectLexical processing timees
dc.titleLexical representations are malleable for about one second: Evidence for the non-automaticity of perceptual recalibrationes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.journals.elsevier.com/cognitive-psychologyes
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.007
dc.subject.categoriaCOMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
dc.subject.categoriaDEVELOPMENTAL AND EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
dc.subject.categoriaLINGUISTICS
dc.subject.categoriaNEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
dc.subject.categoriaPSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record