Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOrdin, Mikhail
dc.contributor.authorNespor, Marina
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-27T10:24:18Z
dc.date.available2017-09-27T10:24:18Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationMikhail Ordin & Marina Nespor (2016) Native Language Influence in the Segmentation of a Novel Language, Language Learning and Development, 12:4, 461-481, DOI: 10.1080/15475441.2016.1154858es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1547-5441
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/22709
dc.descriptionPublished online: 04 Apr 2016.es_ES
dc.description.abstractA major problem in second language acquisition (SLA) is the segmentation of fluent speech in the target language, i.e., detecting the boundaries of phonological constituents like words and phrases in the speech stream. To this end, among a variety of cues, people extensively use prosody and statistical regularities. We examined the role of pitch, duration, and transitional probabilities (TPs) between adjacent syllables in the segmentation of a novel language by native speakers of German and compared their responses with the segmentation by the listeners with a phonologically different native language: Italian. We used an artificial language with different prosodic cues marking the boundaries of statistically defined words. In artificial-language learning experiments, we compared how Germans and Italians use prosodic and statistical cues for segmenting continuous speech. We show that native phonology modulates the processing of prosodic cues in novel languages. While native speakers of Italian interpret prosodic cues at both the word and the phrasal level, native speakers of German interpret them exclusively at the phrasal level. Phrasal prosody can facilitate the segmentation of a novel language when prosodic and statistical cues lead to the same segmentation solution. Word-level prosody does not necessarily facilitate segmentation, but it can disrupt it when statistical and prosodic cues lead to different segmentation solutions.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research leading to these results was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013)/ERC Grant Agreement Number 269502 (PASCAL), by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Germany, and by the Basque Foundation of Science, Spain.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherLanguage Learning and Developmentes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/2007–2013es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/ERC/269502es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectPHRASE BOUNDARIES CONSTRAINes_ES
dc.subjectSPEECH SEGMENTATIONes_ES
dc.subjectRHYTHMIC SIMILARITYes_ES
dc.subjectWORD SEGMENTATIONes_ES
dc.subjectPERCEPTUAL TESTSes_ES
dc.subjectLEXICAL ACCESSes_ES
dc.subjectSTRESSes_ES
dc.subjectCUESes_ES
dc.subjectSPEAKERSes_ES
dc.subjectINFANTSes_ES
dc.titleNative Language Influence in the Segmentation of a Novel Languagees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2016 Taylor & Francises_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.tandfonline.com/loi/hlld20es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15475441.2016.1154858


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record