Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlemán Bañón, José
dc.contributor.authorMiller, David
dc.contributor.authorRothman, Jason
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-24T09:30:20Z
dc.date.available2017-11-24T09:30:20Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationAlemán Bañón, J., Miller, D., & Rothman, J. (2017). Morphological variability in second language learners: An examination of electrophysiological and production data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(10), 1509-1536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000394es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0278-7393
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/23706
dc.descriptionOnline First March 23, 2017es_ES
dc.description.abstractWe examined sources of morphological variability in second language (L2) learners of Spanish whose native language (L1) is English, with a focus on L1-L2 similarity, morphological markedness, and knowledge type (receptive vs. expressive). Experiment 1 uses event-related potentials to examine noun-adjective number (present in L1) and gender agreement (absent in L1) in online sentence comprehension (receptive knowledge). For each feature, markedness was manipulated, such that half of the critical noun-adjective combinations were feminine (marked) and the other half were masculine; half were used in the plural (marked) and the other half were used in the singular. With this setup, we examined learners’ potential overreliance on unmarked forms or “defaults” (singular/masculine). Experiment 2 examines similar dependencies in spoken sentence production (expressive knowledge). Learners (n = 22) performed better with number than gender overall, but their brain responses to both features were qualitatively native-like (i.e., P600), even though gender was probed with nouns that do not provide strong distributional cues to gender. In addition, variability with gender agreement was better accounted for by lexical (as opposed to syntactic) aspects. Learners showed no advantage for comprehension over production, and no systematic evidence of reliance on morphological defaults, although their online processing was sensitive to markedness in a native-like manner. Overall, these results suggest that there is facilitation for L2 properties that exist in the L1 and that markedness impacts L2 processing, but in a native-like manner. These results also speak against proposals arguing that adult L2ers have deficits at the level of the morphology or the syntax.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipJosé Alemán Bañón was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (FPDI-2013-15813). David Miller was supported by a PhD fellowship from the AThEME project (Advancing the European Multilingual Experience), funded by the European Research Council.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognitiones_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/FPDI-2013-15813es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/SFP7/FP-SSH-2013-1/613465es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectL2 sentence processinges_ES
dc.subjectnumber and gender agreementes_ES
dc.subjectevent-related potentialses_ES
dc.subjectmorphological variabilityes_ES
dc.subjectmarkednesses_ES
dc.titleMorphological Variability in Second Language Learners: An Examination of Electrophysiological and Production Dataes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2017 American Psychological Associationes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/xlm/es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/xlm0000394


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record